search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WAYFINDING


a harmful delay in the person getting the care they need. Have you identified and assessed wayfinding information along these potential emergency routes and destinations at your sites? Carrying out Wayfinding Risk Audits and developing Lost Person Protocols for each of your sites will help avoid future tragedies.


How Wayfinding Risk Audits identify safety issues Wayfinding audits to identify safety risks are not a ‘nice to have’ or a ‘will do later’ task – they are essential for keeping people safe and for risk reduction at your sites. Audits should: n Identify public routes with access to restricted, rarely used areas, stairwells, exits, and rooms where someone could go missing.


n Map high-risk junctions, decision points, and vertical circulation routes.


n Walk the routes and identify potential high-risk decision points.


n Walk the routes with first-time visitors, and people living with cognitive, sensory, or physical impairments. Ask if they are confused by any of the safety information or environmental features at the high-risk locations on the route.


n Listen to staff interactions along the routes – are staff able to give directions that avoid people accessing high-risk areas?


n Repeat audits at different times of the day. n Create a prioritised Risk Reduction Action Plan based on the audit findings.


n Install new wayfinding information, environmental safety features, or physical barriers where necessary.


Identifying routes that connect linked services – such as maternity wards to neonatal units – is important. Risk assessing the potential for people to move from public to restricted areas is crucial. Do you need to install barriers and other environmental interventions, or new safety and warning signs, to prevent accidental access into rarely used stairwells? Wayfinding failure is an underestimated safety risk. Wayfinding systems should be treated as a safety-critical operational issue, not a cosmetic enhancement project.


Why hospital wayfinding is so difficult Sites with multiple buildings linked by corridors and a maze of external pathways and internal corridors is common. People inevitably encounter wayfinding problems. Creating a mental map of complex sites is hard, especially when departments relocate, services merge, old buildings are demolished, and new ones added. Your mind maps (and your site maps) change frequently. Redrawing your maps is often challenging but it is essential for wayfinding success. Site changes in today’s NHS hospitals cause:


n Outdated signs after relocations, and when new buildings open.


n Inconsistent naming conventions across Trust sites. n Lack of ownership for planning, funding, and updating wayfinding systems.


n Out-of-date verbal directions being given by staff. n Limited budget for new wayfinding strategies and system maintenance.


Three factors influence wayfinding success – people, information, and environments Wayfinding systems are complex, hybrid systems. Success is affected by the people you train, the information you


Above: An example of a ‘bad’ hospital sign.


Left: Paper signs.


provide, and the environments you create, including: n People giving directions – in person, over the phone or in writing – and a person’s individual ability to navigate and move around your site.


n Information at your site – signs, maps, leaflets, and diagrams, and in digital formats – appointment letters, texts, emails, and websites.


n Environmental interventions – canopies at external entrances, lifts and staircases that are visible from the approach, lighting at reception desks, flooring that guides people along key routes and describable landmarks located at key decision points.


These three inter-related, interconnected factors make hospital wayfinding systems difficult to manage, with different directorates, teams, and professionals often working in silos to design and implement each factor.


Effective wayfinding systems involves many directorates and teams The three biggest barriers to having a consistent, clear hospital wayfinding systems are: n A lack of ownership. n A lack of allocated funding. n A lack of central management.


A small number of Trusts have appointed a Wayfinding Manager or Champion. A few have set up cross- directorate Wayfinding Working Groups. Some work with


October 2026 Health Estate Journal 41


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188