search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
We always look forward to the buzz that is created when we


release a Fishin’ Frenzy or Eye of Horus title as they have built up significant followings over the years too. We’ve got enough confidence in our


teams here at Blueprint that we know even if we launch a brand new title with a theme or


characters that have never been tried before, our standing as a studio ensures that we gain traction.


overriding high standards we employ across the board.


How much more expensive are licensed products to create - are the development costs, certification, sales, marketing, and promotional efforts significantly higher than non-branded content?


While there are added costs above and beyond creating a proprietary themed game, there is of course the counterbalance of the added interest from players and operators – provided everything is done just right, of course!


Our complete commitment to producing further Deal or No Deal titles is why we sealed a new deal with Banijay Brands and we look forward to developing new titles in the future. Branded games have for some time proved successful for us and will always form a part of our roadmap – as long as the demand is there in the market.


Is branded content more likely to cut through the noise than Blueprint's non-branded content such as King of the West and Eye of Horus?


It depends. You have the initial brand awareness that we’ve mentioned that attracts players but the gameplay has to be equally on point to match that. Our portfolio is very diverse and we’ve enjoyed great success with proprietary titles too.


We always look forward to the buzz that is created when we release a Fishin’ Frenzy or Eye of Horus title as they have built up significant followings over the years too. We’ve got enough confidence in our teams here at Blueprint that we know even if we launch a brand new title with a theme or characters that have never been tried before, our standing as a studio ensures that we gain traction. It’s up to us to maintain the standards we’ve set.


How do you assess the opportunity cost of branded content? How do you ascertain brand value on the slot floor and online operator lobbies?


Tat’s important and always forms part of the


decision process and if we know a particular brand will work well for our operator customers, we’ll endeavour to create a game that meets their requirements. Even though games like Deal or No Deal or Te Goonies were first released many years ago, the games are still heavily used by operators for marketing initiatives.


Tis is mostly driven by brand awareness and the ability to generate interest among a wide set of players. Tis epitomises the power and longevity that licensed games have in our industry and why operators will always prioritise space for them.


How much attention is given to the narrative and player journey of Deal or No Deal, The Money Drop and Peaky Blinders so that these games remain on-brand?


It’s crucial. Terefore, it receives the due diligence we afford it during research and development. Not only is it demanded by our players, but it’s also equally as important to the licence holders too. Tere’s a reason why these brands have become popular in the first place and that’s partly because of the narrative that existed initially.


We wouldn’t be able to release a game that didn’t have the journey or the authenticity and even if it got past our internal quality control and that of the licence holder, it certainly wouldn’t fool the players! Te communities that surround game franchises and slots, in general, are more powerful than ever before and we’re very respectful of ensuring we’re delivering products that players want to play with the inherent quality that goes with that.


How do you differentiate IP products by market?


Part of the selection criteria for many of the IPs we invest in is that they are largely universally popular, that way, we’re not restricting ourselves in terms of the markets that we can see them succeed in.


Titles like Deal or No Deal, Te Goonies, Rick and Morty, Ted and Sausage Party have massive global followings so providing we always stay faithful to our ethos of matching big brands with equally consistent standards of gameplay and engagement we can be confident of success going forward.


Tere are a few exceptions for the UK, which of course is born of our roots in the UK market and you see that in games like Viz, Andy Capp and Carry on Camping which are all very UK- centric. Due to the size of the market, it’s still a worthwhile enterprise.


Ultimately, what is more important - the theme and licence or the underlying maths and mechanics?


It’s a delicate balance. Tere is a great investment in resources required to produce branded games. Te process is very different compared to that of an in-house title, as you’re having to meet every aspect of a licence holder’s requirements. We’re experts in developing branded iGaming content having


released a comprehensive range of licensed games over the years, but we never take for granted the sheer amount of work and precision required to produce a quality product.


Tere’s the inherent risk of producing an inferior product that fails to meet the expectations of a brand’s fanbase, or even your own loyal players. Some developers think the use of a famous brand is enough to drive engagement, but ultimately the gameplay still needs to be entertaining enough to keep players interested.


At Blueprint, we have a strict policy of only working with brands that meet our style of games and that we know will be appealing to existing players. If you look at the IPs we have utilised previously, they follow a similar mould and help us deliver games that live and breathe the sense of humour and entertainment factor that Blueprint is renowned for creating.


What is the future for Blueprint's branded content?


Given how well we’ve done on the back of keeping a careful, close eye on popular culture trends and exploring how they could be adapted for use in iGaming, it’s safe to say you can expect more of what has worked in the past while still ensuring we keep things relevant.


Ultimately, any use of an IP needs to capture the interest of both seasoned slot players and fans of a brand. Te entertainment world is constantly evolving and as an industry, we need to be on the front foot to ensure our content remains exciting and credible.


We’ll always see popular TV shows and films form a big part of the branded slots landscape and we’ve got the next Deal or No Deal game slated for a January 2023 release. Beyond that, who knows what else the future holds?


Sports is one area of branded content that is likely to grow. We developed our first branded sports game a few years ago with the release of PDC World Darts Championship, which enjoyed an upturn in plays during the real-life tournament that took place not long afterwards.


We’ve also managed to secure the rights to produce a game based on one of the world’s greatest ever footballers, Diego Maradona, which is a project we’re incredibly excited about and is due for release toward the end of the year.


Sports is one area of branded content that is likely to grow. We developed our first branded sports game a few years ago with the release of PDC World Darts Championship, which enjoyed an upturn in plays during the real-life tournament that took place not long afterwards.


NEWSWIRE / INTERACTIVE / MARKET DATA P79


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108