search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
California is the biggest untapped US market with


potentially hundreds of millions at stake.


However, the issue is especially complex due to the fact that the state allows for card rooms (86


locations in a variety of cities), tribal


gaming (65 casinos on tribal lands) and race tracks all of which have a vested interest in how sports betting develops in the state.


ballot in California as a combined initiated constitutional amendment and state statute in November. It allows for online betting with revenue dedicated to combating the homelessness crisis in California. It is supported by FanDuel, DraftKings, and BetMGM as well as a number of city mayors. It would allow online sports wagering run by Native American tribes or betting operators that contract with them. Tis act would act in conjunction with other proposals which would allow for retail sports betting.


Another initiative, Te California Sports Wagering Regulation and Unlawful Gambling Enforcement Act, would allow Native American tribes and racetracks as well as some California card rooms to offer in-person and online sports betting. However, other card rooms have filed a lawsuit in an attempt to keep the sports betting initiative off the ballot. Tey argue that the initiative be removed as it violates California’s constitutional rule that ballot initiatives can involve only a single subject.


Meanwhile, “Te Age-Verified Tribal Online and In-Person Sports Wagering Act” was filed with the California Attorney General’s Office on November 5. It would allow in-person and online sports wagering to be conducted and regulated by tribal operators.


FLORIDA CALIFORNIA


California is the biggest untapped US market with potentially hundreds of millions at stake. However, the issue is especially complex due to the fact that the state allows for card rooms (86 locations in a variety of cities), tribal gaming (65 casinos on tribal lands) and race tracks, all of which have a vested interest in how sports betting develops in the state. It is perhaps no surprise that lawmakers have been unable to find a way that would meet with the approval of all


stakeholders. Consequently, the issue will in all likelihood go before a ballot at the end of this year.


According to some estimates, tribal casinos have already spent as much as $100m to fight off outside sportsbooks from operating in their state. Meanwhile, operators such as DraftKings and FanDuel are lobbying for their own piece of the potential market.


“Te California Solutions to Homeless and Mental Health Support Act” may appear on the


Te Seminole Tribe, which was one of the forerunners of the Indian Gaming movement, will play a pivotal role in the future of the sports betting industry. In November 2017, Florida voters voted in favour of state constitutional Amendment 3 by a vote of 71.47 per cent to 28.53 per cent, which takes the right to issue a casino licence away from the Florida Legislature and gave it to the electorate. Te Seminole Tribe owns six casinos in the state.


However, the future of sports betting in Florida remains uncertain even though Florida entered into a gaming compact with the Seminole Tribe in April 2021. Te 75-page compact gave the Tribe the exclusive ability to conduct sports betting in the state until 2051. Te compact is now being reviewed by the federal government over allegations that


WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS P37


INSIGHT SPORTS BETTING


the compact had been corrupted by non tribal casino interests. In June in a letter to Deb Haaland, secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, Miami Beach Mayor Dan Gelber asked the federal government to reject the compact arguing that the expansion amounted to a violation of state and federal law.


“It was simply a vehicle hijacked by non-tribal casino interests who fully corrupted the legislative and executive process in order to obtain advantages outside of tribal land and in direct contravention to the interests of Floridians,” Gelber wrote in his letter.


In addition, a number of private gaming entities in Florida have sued the state after the compact was approved, arguing that they were being kept out of the sports betting market, while the Seminole Tribe was being allowed to illegally operate in spite of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) provisions.


In November, US District Judge Dabney Friedrich ruled that the


The future of sports betting remains uncertain even though Florida entered into a gaming compact with the Seminole Tribe in April 2021. The compact gave the Tribe the


exclusive rights to conduct sports


betting in the state until 2051. The


compact is now being reviewed by


federal government over allegations that the compact had been corrupted by non tribal casino interests.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154