search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Page 6


www.us-tech.com


Deep Learning Secures Chips Against Counterfeits


Published By: Mid-Atlantic Tech Publications, Inc. Phoenixville, PA 19460 Established January, 1986


U.S. TechWorld HQ Advertising&Editorial Offices


U.S. Tech 10 Gay Street Phoenixville, PA 19460


Phone: Fax:


E-mail: Web:


(610) 783-6100 (610) 628-3891


mail@us-tech.com www.us-tech.com


Publisher and President: Jacob Fattal


Office Manager: Ruri Chandra


Editor Emeritus: Walter Salm


Editor: Michael Skinner


Art Director: Mike Swavola


Cartoonist: Ted Goff Copyright © 2024


Mid-Atlantic Tech Publications, Inc. Contents not be reproduced or reprinted in any form without written permission from the publisher. Opinions expressed on Tech Op-Ed pages and by our colum- nists are the views of the person or per- sons authoring the material.


Continued from page 1


(PUFs), which are unique physi- cal systems that are difficult for adversaries to replicate either because of economic constraints or inherent physical properties.” Optical PUFs, which capi-


talize on the distinct optical re- sponses of random media, are es- pecially promising. “However, there are signifi-


cant challenges in achieving scalability and maintaining ac- curate discrimination between adversarial tampering and natu- ral degradation, such as physical aging at higher temperatures, packaging abrasions and humid- ity impact,” Kildishev says. Kildishev and his team drew


inspiration for RAPTOR from the capabilities of deep-learning models.


Creating RAPTOR “RAPTOR is a novel deep-


learning approach, a discrimina- tor that identifies tampering by analyzing gold nanoparticle pat- terns embedded on chips,” says Kildishev. “It is robust under ad- versarial tampering features such as malicious package abra- sions, compromised thermal treatment and adversarial tear- ing.”


Yuheng Chen, a doctoral


student in Kildishev’s group, said RAPTOR uses the distance matrix verification of gold nanoparticles. “The gold nanoparticles are


randomly and uniformly distrib- uted on the chip sample substrate, but their radii are normally dis- tributed. An original database of randomly positioned dark-field


images is created through dark- field microscopy characteriza- tion,” he says. “Gold nanoparticles can easily be measured using dark-field microscopy. This is a readily available technique that can integrate seamlessly into any stage of the semiconductor fabri- cation pipeline.” Blake Wilson, an alumnus of


Kildishev’s group, says, “RAP- TOR uses an attention mecha- nism for prioritizing nanoparti- cle correlations across pre-tamp- er and post-tamper samples be- fore passing them into a residual attention-based deep convolu- tional classifier. It takes nanoparticles in de-


scending order of radii to con- struct the distance matrices and radii from the pre-tamper and post-tamper samples.”


Validation The Purdue team tested


RAPTOR’s counterfeit detection capability by simulating the tampering behavior in nanopar- ticle systems. This included nat- ural changes, malicious adver-


sarial tampering, thermal fluctu- ations and varying degrees of random Gaussian translations of the nanoparticles. “We have proved that RAP-


TOR has the highest average ac- curacy, correctly detecting tam- pering in 97.6% of distance ma- trices under worst-case scenario tampering assumptions,” Wilson says. “This exceeds the perform- ance of the previous methods — Hausdorff, Procrustes and Aver- age Hausdorff distance — by 40.6%, 37.3%, and 6.4%, respec- tively.”


Kildishev says the team is


planning to collaborate with chip-packaging researchers to further innovate the nanoparti- cle embedding process and streamline the authentication steps.


“At the moment, RAPTOR is


a proof of concept that demon- strates AI’s great potential in the semiconductor industry,” he says. “Ultimately, we want to convert it into a mature industry solution.” Web: www.purdue.edu r


Takaya Exhibits Flying Probe Test Technology


Continued from page 1


4.0 standards. Vertical communication in-


formation exchange be tween an MES Server and the Takaya APT software offers many possibilities for seeing real time test data and controlling the test profile based on real-time test results.


Contact: TEXMAC, Inc.,


3370 Montgomery Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054 % 408-970-8500 E-mail: rmckenzie@texmacusa.com Web: www.texmac.com


See at SMTAI, Booth 2823 Contents


Tech-Op-Ed .............................4 Tech Watch ...........................10 People......................................12 Business News.......................14 Business Briefs......................15 Management............................16 EMS ........................................18 Electronic Mfg. Prods..............30 Production...............................42 Partnering................................44 Distribution..............................46 New Products.........................82 High-Tech Events...................92 2025 Editorial Calendar..........92 Advertisers Index....................94


Special Focus: Components and Production............................. 48


Product Preview:


SMTAI, The ASSEMBLY Show, electronica................................60


See at MD&M MN, Booth 2717, at SMTAI, Booth 2103, at The ASSEMBLY Show, Booth 1711, and at electronica, Hall B1, Booth 420


October, 2024


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96