search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Page 24


www.us - tech.com The Advantages of Renting Test and Measurement Equipment By Kris Kelly, Test Equipment Specialist, Advanced Test Equipment Corp. E


MC, electrical, mechanical, environ- mental simulation, and non-destruc- tive testing equipment may be avail-


able to rent rather than to buy. If a piece of testing equipment is only needed for a short- term project, it can be rented, used for the duration of the test, and then sent back, sav- ing a significant portion of the budget. It’s similar to needing a car on vacation —


buying a car for a short trip would be imprac- tical and renting is often the most sensible op- tion. From a budgeting perspective, equipment rental is considered an operating ex- pense, not a capital expense, making it much more likely to be quickly approved. Lab engineers and traveling con-


sultants in the medical device, automo- tive, aerospace, defense, communica- tions, EMC, consumer electronics and others rely on rental test equipment. In the past, MedTech companies like Boston Scientific, Modular Medical, Medtronic, Werfen, and others, have been known to rent RF power amplifiers, conducted immunity generators, and en- vironmental chambers, as an example.


With Engineers in Mind Whether it’s a Fortune 100 compa-


ny or a startup, the need is the same: get the required test equipment into the hands of engineers when they need it. Engi- neers don’t have the luxury of wasting time, especially when securing equipment for each test phase on their schedule. The equipment


RF test equipment.


ply describes the test requirements to a repre- sentative who suggests the appropriate solu- tion that meets their needs. The equipment is typically shipped within a day and arrives


must be ready when they are and must meet the highest standards of quality. Historically, when an engineer needed


test equipment, they had to determine the specific equipment the test requires, perform the required research, contact the manufac- turer’s representative, explain the test re- quirements, identify the correct model, place the order, then wait 2 to 9 months for deliv- ery since most test equipment is built after customers place their order. With rental equipment, the engineer sim-


within a week. This efficiency not only saves time but guarantees that engineers have ac- cess to high-quality, ready-to-use equipment, so they can focus on their core tasks.


Advantages Many have rented rather than purchased


for a variety of reasons. It provides cost-effec- tive solutions for short-term projects or over- load, protects against capital investments and product obsolescence, and saves time and mon- ey with immediate delivery. Renting also provides the ability to


evaluate the equipment before pur- chasing, gives the ability to choose from multiple manufacturers of the same type of equipment, and avoids wasting time and money on mainte- nance costs. Finally, renting can provide a


“Plan B” when allocated equipment fails, and in most cases rental expenses are tax deductible.


Trustworthy Partner There are several companies in the


U.S. that specialize in renting test equip- ment. Some are specific to types of equipment such as electrical or environ- mental testing, while others cater to a broader range of needs. Some are small,


independent operations, while others are part of multinational companies. Just like in any industry, the reliability


Continued on next page


Jan/Feb 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92