search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Detecting PFAS Compounds in Food Packaging Authors: Milica Jovanovic, BSc, MSc, University Professor DI Dr Erich Leitner, Institute of Analytical Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Graz University of Technology, Austria


Better assessing the hidden threat of ‘forever chemicals’


Poly- and perfl uoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely used in everyday applications, and there are approximately 5,000 known PFAS structures. This article presents a targeted approach for detecting and quantifying 24 PFAS commonly found in paper and board matrices.


Poly- and perfl uoroalkyl substances - PFAS - are man-made chemicals which are widely used in a range of applications, from water-resistant clothing to food-packaging materials. Often called ‘forever chemicals’, these compounds have a special chemical structure: multiple fl uorine atoms attached to an alkyl chain.


As PFAS are highly resistant towards chemical and physical strains, they are long-lasting, bio-accumulative and unfortunately toxic.


In recent years, PFAS have been increasingly detected in water, soil, air, as well as in wildlife and human beings. As a result, some PFAS have recently begun to be regulated or even phased out. But so far only a few of the substances have been assessed for risk by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).


Assessing the threat of PFAS in food packaging


PFAS can enter the human body through various sources, but one of the major pathways is food consumption. There are several different analytical methods used for detecting and quantifying PFAS in food-packaging materials. However, the most selective and sensitive method is liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry - LC-MS/MS.


Researchers at the Institute of Analytical Chemistry and Food Chemistry at the Graz University of Technology in Austria tested a simple method for extracting PFAS from paper and board matrices using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), followed by quantifi cation using LC-MS/MS. They analysed 24 PFAS substances most commonly found in paper food-contact materials. For each substance, they identifi ed the precursor ion and product ion, as well as the retention time (Table 1).


Figure 1. Shimadzu LCMS-8060


Liquid Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer


LCMS-8060NX


Table 1. List of analytes, retention times (RT) and MRM transitions


Enhanced performance Sensitivity and robustness


The LCMS-8060NX culminates Shimadzu’s expertise in triple quadrupole MS. Its Analytical Intelligence func- tions improve user operational efficiency and productiv- ity in the workflow. World-class sensitivity meets ultra- high detection speed. The system benefits method development and routine analysis in pharmaceutical, clinical, environmental and food safety applications.


World-class sensitivity through heated ESI built-in expanding parameters for real world samples


Speed beyond comparison due to data acquisition with unmatched scan speed and shortest polarity switching time


Superior robustness based on UF-Qarray II and QF-Lens II technologies as well as IonFocus unit balancing robustness and sensitivity


Automated workflow from analysis to data processing greatly improving efficiency, user operation and productivity


For this, an extraction method was used in combination with a chromatographic separation process and mass-selective detection. Specifi cally, the PFAS analysis was carried out by injecting 5 µL of the prepared solutions into a Shimadzu LCMS- 8050 system with the parameters. The analytes were chromatographically separated using a Restek Raptor C18 column. To separate PFAS which could potentially leach out from the instrument upstream of the injector, a Restek Delay column was used.


The calibration solutions were analysed at fi ve injections for each concentration. Both at high- range and low-range concentration solutions, the regression coeffi cient (R2) was above 0.99 for most analytes. Even after extraction the regression coeffi cient was above 0.99 for the majority of analytes, except for higher PFAS. The average recovery between all the analytes is 88.8 %, which is within the required criteria set by the EU Reference Laboratory for Halogenated POPs.


The Analytical Intelligence logo is a trademark of Shimadzu Corporation.


Despite their many benefi ts, PFAS currently pose a risk worth measuring. The researchers in Graz succeeded in developing a method to specifi cally identify and precisely quantify PFAS in food packaging. They concluded that the Shimadzu LCMS-8050 reliably measures PFAS concentration ranges up to 0.01 pg/µL (which translates to 0.025 ng/g of sample), and that its combination of high sensitivity with outstanding speed parameters makes it well-suited for high-throughput multi- component analysis. It can be benefi cially used as an integral part of a simple and effi cient method for the monitoring and quantifi cation of PFAS in paper- based food-packaging materials.


More information onnline: ilmt.co/PL/XA94 and ilmt.co/PL/8jz2


www.shimadzu.eu/enhanced-performance 59942pr@reply-direct.com SHIMAEU_2023_010_Anz_LCMS-8060NX_180x254_RZ2_mh.indd 1 09.03.23 08:50 INTERNATIONAL LABMATE - APRIL 2023 - ADVERTORIAL

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56