Air Monitoring 43


New Technologies Improve Detection of Airborne Biological Particles


The health effects of airborne particles have become the subject of increased scrutiny in recent years. However, initiatives to improve air quality are dependent on accurate and reliable monitoring methods for physical, chemical and biological particles. In this article, Romain Verollet, from Bertin Technologies in France, examines the traditional methods for bioaerosol monitoring and explains the advantages that are now available with a new ‘wet walled cyclone’ technology.


The complexity of airborne biological particles has been hidden by traditional microbiological techniques; however researchers, environmentalists and public health authorities are now looking to better understand biological contamination and these new developments in sampling and microbiological analysis are providing an insight that has not been viable in the past.


The Coriolis µ rapidly collects biological particles in liquid at a high flow rate with validated efficiency


This improved method for sampling bioaerosols such as bacteria, pollen, endotoxins, viruses and fungal spores, has coincided with advances in microbiological analysis. In combination, these developments have reduced testing times and significantly lowered detection limits, which greatly expands the opportunities for understanding the biological quality of air in applications such as occupational exposure, hospital acquired infection, infectious diseases in animals and ambient pollution.


Outdoor environment


Composting sites, wastewater treatment works and air-cooling towers all represent a significant potential hazard from airborne bioaerosols. However, the microbial diversity of bioaerosols released during the operation of these facilities is poorly understood.


New sampling technology


Traditional techniques rely on the impaction of particles on a solid agar medium, and are limited by low flow rates and unreliable impaction. They are also restricted to particles that can be cultivated. In contrast, the wet walled cyclonic instrument (Coriolis µ) rapidly collects biological particles in liquid at a high flow rate (300lpm) with validated efficiency and the liquid containing the particles is compatible with a number of rapid microbiological analysis methods. This includes PCR, which enables the quantification and qualification of most targets.


Author Details:


Romain VEROLLET, Head of product management at Bertin Technologies Tel: +33 139 306 118 Email: verollet@bertin.fr Web:


www.bertin.fr www.coriolis-airsampler.com


The Coriolis µ was developed for applications in which the performance of traditional techniques is insufficient. For example, air with a high bioaerosol burden would quickly saturate traditional solid media, whereas the Coriolis µ offers the possibility to divide the liquid into multiple agar plates. This technology also has advantages in air with a low burden, because the Coriolis µ can collect for an extended period (up to hours), which would not be possible with traditional methods due to desiccation of the agar plate.


Jim Mills from Air Monitors Ltd is launching the Coriolis µ in the UK market says “This is an exciting development and I hope that it will become a standard method very quickly. In the meantime, I can see a wide variety of research and air quality investigation applications that would greatly benefit from this technology. For example, the UK suffers from regular outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease and I believe that the ability to sample Legionella bacteria in the air; when they are able to cause infection, would significantly improve detection and prevention work.”


Composting is growing in popularity as governments look to recycle waste materials, so the number of new composting sites looks set to continue. This has generated a greater requirement for bioaerosol monitoring to ensure that local inhabitants are not affected by new developments. In many countries, it is common practice to routinely monitor bioaerosols at composting sites, and work has been undertaken to identify potential microbial indicators [1].


Coriolis µ sampling outdoors


Legionnaires’ disease has been most commonly associated with hot and cold water systems in large buildings, such as hospitals and hotels, and infections are usually sporadic as opposed to outbreaks with large numbers of people affected. Historically outbreaks have been associated with wet evaporative condensers (cooling towers), but increased controls have reduced incidences. Nevertheless, traditional monitoring techniques have focused on water samples whereas Legionella bacteria are dispersed in aerosols and very little work has been undertaken to assess the levels of airborne infection.


Since Legionella are difficult to cultivate on classical agar dishes, they are not detectable with the traditional method of impaction. However, Legionella can be detected in air and quantified with chemiluminescence antibody microarrays within a short response time [2].


www.envirotech-online.com IET September / October 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68