search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
20


MASS SPECTROSCOPY FOCUS


7700x ORS3 Collision or Reaction Mode


Collision/Reaction Cells (CRCs) in ICP-MS can operate either as reaction cells (when a reactive gas is used) or as collision cells (when an inert gas is used). Since the first commercial CRC ICP-MS systems were introduced 10 years ago, the relative performance of these two approaches has been the subject of intense debate.


With a reactive cell gas, interference removal is based on the relative rates at which the selected reaction gas reacts with the analyte and interfering ion pair. In order to select which reactive gas should be used, the interference must therefore be identified in advance, which means the matrix must be known, relatively simple, and consistent.


In some applications (e.g. semiconductor process chemicals) these criteria are met, and reaction mode can be used successfully. However, in most applications the sample matrix is unknown, variable, and often complex. Under these circumstances, reactive cell gases will lead to serious analytical problems: • Each reaction gas will only react with certain interferences; unreactive interferences will remain, leading to errors.


• All reaction gases will create some new polyatomic ions (cell-formed product ions) causing new, matrix-dependent interferences.


• Reaction gases react with some analyte ions, leading to severe signal loss for some analytes, degrading detection limits.


With an inert cell gas, interference removal is mainly by kinetic energy discrimination (KED). This process works because polyatomic interferences are by definition molecular ions, and have a larger ionic cross section than analyte (single atom) ions at the same mass. Polyatomics collide more often with the cell gas and lose more energy, and so can be prevented from passing into the analyzer by applying a fixed KED bias voltage.


The key benefits of collision mode are that it can remove multiple interferences on multiple analytes, no new polyatomic interferences are produced regardless of the sample matrix, and selective analyte signal loss by reaction does not occur.


The 3rd generation Octopole Reaction System (ORS3 ) featured in the


Agilent 7700 Series ICP-MS has been developed to give the highest performance in helium (He) collision mode. This requires an extremely narrow initial ion energy spread (delivered by the ShieldTorch System), and the capability to maintain high ion transmission at the high cell gas pressure needed for effective KED (provided by the small internal volume, octopole-based ORS3


cell). Helium Mode in the ORS3


Figure 1 illustrates the relative performance of different cell modes for the removal of multiple interferences on the 1st


row


transition elements. No gas mode (top), H2 reaction mode (middle) and He mode (bottom) spectra are shown for the same


matrices (5% HNO3, 5% HCl, 1% H2SO4 and 1% IPA), on the same intensity scale. The complex polyatomic interferences created in


this matrix mix are evident in the no gas mode spectra shown in Figure 1 (top).


LAB ASIA - NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2009 - MASS SPECTROSCOPY FOCUS Figure 1. Mixed matrix in no gas, H2 and He mode (inset: with 10 ppb spike)


For more information on the 7700 Series ICP-MS visit the Agilent Technologies web site at: www.agilent.com/chem/7700icpms-ad


Circle no. 363


and Helium Mode More effective interference removal in complex samples


Figure 1 (middle) shows that H2 reaction mode leaves some residual overlaps, and creates several new ones. By contrast, Figure 1 (bottom) confirms that He mode effectively removes all the polyatomic interferences in this complex matrix. High sensitivity is maintained in He mode, as shown by the inset spectrum of a 10 ppb spike measured under the same conditions.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56