search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Socio‐ecological systems and distress 647


expansion of contract farming were wealthier families with large amounts of land, many of whom were Indigenous Banyoro. However, this expansion reportedly displaced sub- sistence farming, potentially exacerbating social determinants of psychological distress amongst poorer households (Fig. 5). The Ugandan government has sought to promote contract farming models as a tool for poverty alleviation (White et al., 2012). However, our results corroborate other studies suggesting that this model could have limitations in terms of delivering pro-poor development (Mwavu et al., 2018; Martiniello, 2021). More broadly, numerous studies across various countries illustrate the diverse impacts of commercial agriculture on smallholder farming systems, sometimes contributing to food insecurity and poverty amongst vulner- able groups (Hall et al., 2017). For example, agriculture com- mercialization has been linked to global market exposure, indebtedness and uncertain yields, leading to high rates of suicide in some farming communities (Mohanakumar & Sharma, 2006).


FIG. 5 Hypothesized causal connections between two socio-ecological action situations, social determinants and psychological distress affecting respondents in Nyabyeya Parish, Uganda.


context this could mean acknowledging and acting on peo- ple’s concerns about landscape management and policy (Bennett, 2016). For example, the Ugandan Government should investigate how rural residents view conservation, and avoid policies that are perceived to worsen inequalities and trigger ‘thinking too much’. This process could be facili- tated by strengthening the decentralized governance system in Uganda (Mushemeza, 2019), with local councils soliciting the perspectives of residents and raising these perspectives with decision-makers in central government. Perceptions can also influence attitudes and behaviours


and the success of projects that depend on local support (Bennett, 2016). For example, perceptions regarding forests as a source of resources and a home for crop-eating wildlife (both reportedly indirectly linked to ‘thinking too much’) may influence attitudes towards their protection. Pre- venting or compensating for human–wildlife conflict has been a persistent issue in the study area and elsewhere in East Africa. However, there are emerging innovations that Ugandan authorities could consider, such as community- operated compensation schemes (Watve et al., 2016). If suc- cessful, such interventions might reduce experiences of ‘thinking too much’ and foster support for local forest con- servation, potentially contributing to sustainable develop- ment and biodiversity goals.


Agro-ecological systems and ‘thinking too much’ The prominence of the sugarcane industry across responses was unexpected, but this theme emerged as important. Our findings indicate that most of those who benefitted from the


Study limitations


This study was primarily focused on the perspectives of re- spondents. Local and Indigenous knowledge can be a valu- able source of information for landscape management and conservation decision-making (Wheeler & Root-Bernstein, 2020). However, these perspectives are also shaped by social and cognitive factors. As such, the current study may not have captured the full breadth of possible linkages between interactions with ecosystems and social determinants of psychological distress. Moreover, residents may have an inaccurate understanding of socio-ecological dynamics or strategically misreported their responses to gain future benefits. Further research could integrate long-term moni- toring of socio-ecological dynamics to evaluate the reliability of the perceptions of respondents.


Conclusion


In this exploratory study, we have applied a new framework that situates social determinants of psychological distress in socio-ecological systems. We find that nature conservation and commercial agriculture could influence social determi- nants of psychological distress. Our case study indicates op- portunities to manage perceived co-benefits and trade-offs between the Sustainable Development Goals, thereby poten- tially improving subjective experiences of mental health, and demonstrates the importance of taking a more holistic and locally nuanced approach to understanding how peo- ple’s relationships with ecosystems relate to psychological distress and mental health.


Author contributions Study design: TP, AK, EK, CA, GM, EJM-G; fieldwork:TP;dataanalysis:TP,AK, EK, BLK, EJM-G;writing:all authors.


Oryx, 2024, 58(5), 641–649 © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605323001710


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140