1056
Journal of Paleontology
in North American metoposaurids, especially A. gregorii (Spielmann and Lucas, 2012). The identification of isolated intercentra should be discouraged given the paucity of articulated or associated skeletons of A. gregorii that possess both elongate intercentra and diagnostic cranial material and of juvenile speci- mens of largemetoposaurids (Long and Murry, 1995; Spielmann and Lucas, 2012). Additionally, past workers have emphasized cranial features over post-cranial features in species determina- tion, which we continue to follow here given the greater phylo- genetic utility of cranial characters (Hunt, 1993; Long andMurry, 1995). Presently, the only species of the genus is K. perfectus; although “Metoposaurus” bakeri has sometimes been placed in the genus, it lacks a lacrimal that enters the orbit, which is the diagnostic feature of Koskinonodon (Hunt, 1993). Given that recent authors no longer consider this character valid for distin- guishing between the two genera, the taxonomic placement of the species remains unresolved (Sulej, 2002;Brusatte et al., 2015; but see Lucas et al., 2007). Additional discussion of the character is beyond the scope of this paper, but regardless of its taxonomic placement, material of “M.” bakeri in the southwest of North America ismostly restricted to the DockumGroup of Texas,with a single documented occurrence in Nova Scotia (Case, 1932; Hunt, 1993; Long and Murry, 1995). Koskinonodon perfectus is the most widespread and most commonly recovered metopo- saurid, and skulls of adult specimens are known to exceed 60cm (Colbert and Imbrie, 1956). Accordingly, PEFO 35392, with a length of 15.4cm from the posteromedial margin of the skull to the posterior margin of the orbit, can be designated as a juvenile of the species (Long andMurry, 1995; Zanno et al., 2002). This is further supported by the histological analysis, which shows that the associated intercentra are relatively immature in spite of the larger size of the skull in comparison to the allegedly mature holotype specimen of A. gregorii. Koskinonodon perfectus is a commonly recovered fossil from the Adamanian land vertebrate faunachron (LVF) of the PEFO, but documentation of diagnostic material is rare in the Revueltian LVF (Hunt, 1993; Long and Murry, 1995;Heckert and Lucas, 2002; Parker andMartz, 2011). At present, PEFO 35392 represents the youngest confirmed occurrence of cranial material of K. perfectus within the park. Although material belonging to adult specimens of the
large North American metoposaurid taxa (K. perfectus and “M.” bakeri) is extremely common in both the Chinle Formation and the Dockum Group, reports of material that can be conclusively identified as belonging to juvenile individuals of the two species are rare (Sulej, 2007). Material ascribed to juveniles has occa- sionally been documented (e.g., Hunt, 1993), but Zanno et al. (2002), who described partial cranial material ascribed to K. perfectus, featured the only previous description of such material. Additionally, that specimen (MNAV8415) is from the Blue Mesa Member, which is well below the horizon containing PEFO 35392, and it was assigned solely on the now invalid character of a lacrimal contacting the orbit (Zanno et al., 2002). Cranial material of small metoposaurids is not uncommon in Norian-age sediments, but it is often highly fragmentary and lacking in any diagnostic characters that allow for a designation at the genus level. The occurrence of a juvenile K. perfectus in younger sedi-
ments than previously documented for the taxon is important for improving our understanding of the Adamanian-Revueltian
faunal turnover, thought to correlate with a climatic shift to an increasingly arid regime with more pronounced seasonality (Dubiel et al., 1991; Parker and Martz, 2011; Nordt et al., 2015). Material of K. perfectus is common in Adamanian strata (Blue Mesa Member, lower Sonsela Member) of the park and rare in Revueltian strata (upper Sonsela Member, Petrified Forest Member), while material of A. gregorii demonstrates the inverse distribution pattern (Hunt and Lucas, 1993), which is thought to reflect a climate-associated transition from large metoposaurids to small ones (Parker and Martz, 2011; Atchley et al., 2013). Past workers have cited several features of A. gregorii, inclu- ding its co-occurrence with a predominantly terrestrial assem- blage, poorly developed lateral line system, elongate intercentra, and pelvic structure, as evidence of adaptations for a more terrestrial lifestyle that would have allowed for this transition (Hunt, 1993). However, it should be noted that elongate inter- centra, the most commonly recovered material of the taxon, are also found in the much larger Dutuitosaurus ouazzoui (Dutuit, 1976), which is considered fully aquatic (Steyer et al., 2004). Additionally, the presence of a poorly developed lateral line should not be considered equivalent to the absence of a lateral line, as would be expected of truly terrestrial forms. Finally, A. gregorii shares far more features with other metoposaurids in contrast to more definitively terrestrial stereospondyls from the Upper Triassic, such as Rileymillerus Bolt and Chatterjee, 2000, which, in addition to being found with predominantly terrestrial fauna, as with A. gregorii, entirely lacks a distinct lateral line system. We consider it plausible that both the morphological differences and the hypothesized ecological transition could also be explained by life stage niche partitioning. This possibi- lity was previously suggested based on strong negative allometry of Koskinonodon limb bones (Rinehart et al., 2008) and is attractive for several reasons. Firstly, changes in habitat occupation and skeletal mor-
phology that are associated with the life cycle are common among both extant and extinct amphibians (Wilbur, 1980; Schoch, 2014). Given the pronounced seasonality that char- acterized the equatorial regions of the Upper Triassic, it would not be unexpected for aquatic taxa, particularly desiccation- prone amphibians, to acquire adaptations that would allow them to tolerate more arid conditions during the dry season (Dubiel et al., 1991; Martz and Parker, 2010; Atchley et al., 2013; Nordt et al., 2015). For example, workers have postulated that M. diagnosticus, which features more robust forelimbs and musculature relative to Dutuitosaurus ouazzoui (two taxa with well-described articulated skeletons), may have been adapted for burrowing into lake sediments during the dry season (Konietzko-Meier and Sander, 2013). Although any transition from a semi-aquatic to an aquatic lifestyle was not likely as dramatic as the full metamorphosis of extant amphibians, changes to the vertebral column and girdles to accommodate different modes of locomotion and to the otic region to account for different auditory reception are not unreasonable to infer. Secondly, occupation of different environments would
increase the potential for taphonomic bias in addition to that associated with hydrodynamic sorting, which would explain the stark difference in relative abundances between the two taxa (e.g., Loughney et al., 2011). Such a bias is clear in the Blue Mesa Member (middle Norian) at the PEFO based on the
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238