976
Journal of Paleontology 91(5):968–980
(male) of the antennular peduncle; anterior end rounded with apparent segmentation (Figs. 3.1, 6,1, 7.4). Labrum pyriform, more or less symmetrical, half as wide as
long (Fig. 3.1, 6.1, 7.4). Mandibles well developed (Figs. 3.1, 6.1, 7.4). Three-segmented palp, first article shortest; second article slightly longer than wide; third article about twice as long as broad. Third article of the right mandible with serrate outer margin. Gnathobasic processes of the left and right mandibles are not discernable; only the molar process is tenuously observed as a flat platelike structure provided with spines. Maxillule difficult to define, without any trace of separation
between the sympod and the lobes (Fig. 5.5). Maxilla exopod is seen as a plate attached to the outer side of the basis, with the outer margin markedly convex; two basal endites and endopod probably two-segmented (Figs. 3.2, 6,1, 7.5). The first thoracopod differs considerably from the remain-
ing thoracic appendages: modified as short maxilliped without exopod (Figs. 3.2, 6.1, 7.6). Endopod short and robust; apparently with four segments not clearly delineated, dactylus fused with nail to form a claw. Female second to eighth thoracopods with oostegites
without any trace of structures (Figs. 5.3, 5.4, 6, 7.15, 7.16). Uropod exopod 3-articulate, longer and broader than endopod, extending slightly beyond telson apex; distal two articles about one third length of the basal article. Telson short, about sub-equal in length to the last
abdominal somite, twice as long as broad (Figs. 3–6, 7.15, 7.16); lateral margins converging distally; apex of telson bidentate; telson cleft to about one-third of its length.
Etymology.—This species is named after “El Pinetell,” the bed of Alcover limestones unit (Catalonian) in which the species was found.
(Fig. 3.2). Second thoracopod longer than first one, without epipodite and with exopod and oostegite (Figs. 3.2, 6.1). Endopod with preischium, ischium and merus fused, twice as long as broad; unsegmented carpopropodus three times as long as greatest width, tapering somewhat distally; dactylus short with pointed nail. Exopod shorter than endopod with basal plate and 6-segmented flagellum (Fig. 7.6). Third to fourth thoracopods with endopod elongated and
robust, much longer than the other thoracopods (Figs. 3.1, 6.1, 7.9, 7.10). Endopod preischium difficult to define, ischium and merus subequal in length; carpopropodus 4-segmented, longer than merus; dactylus with pointed distal nail. Exopod apparently much shorter than endopod. Fifth thoracopod with endopod about one half longer than
the fourth (Figs. 3.1, 6.1, 7.11). Endopod preischium difficult to define, ischium and merus subequal in length; carpopropodus 4-segmented, longer than merus; dactylus with pointed distal nail. Exopod apparently much shorter than endopod. Sixth to eighth thoracopods quite different from the rest,
with preischium and ischium more or less fused, merus short, undivided carpopropodus more or less swollen anteriorly; dactylus with pointed distal nail (Figs. 3.1, 6.1, 7.12, 7.13, 7.14). Exopods apparently much shorter than endopods. Eighth thoracopod exopod with basal plate and 5-segmented flagellum (Fig. 7.14). Female pleopods uniramous, reduced to unsegmented
Remarks.—The placement of Aviamysis n. gen. in the order Mysida family Mysidae, as defined by Wittmann et al. (2014) seems beyond doubt. This assignment is supported by the presence of eight thoracopods without branchiae and with endopods divided in a number of segments, female with seven pair of oostegites, female with five rudimentary pleopods, and the presence of statocysts on the endopod of uropods. Its taxonomic situation among the diverse subfamilies included in the Family, however, is relatively ambiguous. The family Mysidae is divided at present into ten
subfamilies (Meland et al., 2015), of which, Aviamysis has a clear affinity to the subfamily Boreomysinae. Boreomysinae are characterized by the following: a smooth outer margin on the antennal scale ending in non-articulate spine; seven pairs of oostegites; endopods of the third to the eighth thoracopods with carpus distinct and propodus usually divided into two or three subsegments; pleomeres without projecting pleural plates; females with pleopods reduced to unsegmented rods; exopod of uropods divided by a rudimentary, transverse articulation; statocyst containing a small, non-mineralized statolith; and telson with apical cleft (Tattersall and Tattersall, 1951;Wittman et al., 2014). Two extant genera are included in this sub- family: Boreomysis Sars, 1869, and Birsteiniamysis Tchindo- nova, 1981. In accordance with this definition of the subfamily, the
lobes (Figs. 5.1, 5.2, 6.1), increasing in length from first to fourth and fifth pairs; fifth pleopod extending to posterior end of posterior abdominal somite. Uropod endopod slender, with statocyst, not extending to
telson apex, outer margin sinuous (Figs. 3–6, 8.2). Statocyst trace apparently circular with a maximum diameter of ~1mm,
placement of Aviamysis in the Boreomysinae seems reasonable. In particular, different morphological characters traditionally regarded as plesiomorphic features between the order Mysida, as discussed by Schlacher et al. (1992), are present on the subfamily Boreomysinae (e.g., subdivided exopod of uro- pods and seven pairs of oostegites). The remaining Mysidae taxa usually have two or three pairs of oostegites (Wittmann et al., 2014). An additional shared character state in the basal taxa
Petalophthalmidae, Boreomysinae, and Rhopalophthalminae (and also in the more derived Siriellinae) is the presence of a suture in the exopod of uropod. With reference to molecular phylogeny (Meland and Willassen, 2007), the divided exopod gains support as an ancestral state in Mysida evolution (Meland et al., 2015).
Figure 7. Detailed reconstructions of the main appendages of Aviamysis pinetellensis n. gen. n. sp.: (1, 3–15) PI1, holotype female, (2, 16) PI47, male paratype. (1) Female antennule; (2) male antennule; (3) antenna; (4) labrum, mandibles and the lanceolate-shaped median ventral projection arising from front of the labrum; (5) maxillule; (6) maxilla; (7) 1st thoracopod; (8) 2nd thoracopod; (9) 3rd thoracopod; (10) 4th thoracopod; (11) 5th thoracopod; (12) 6th thoracopod; (13) 7th thoracopod; (14) 8th thoracopod; (15) female telson and uropods in ventral view; (16) male telson and uropods in dorsal view. Scale bar 1–14=0.5mm; scale bar 15, 16=0.2mm.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238