search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Brigadier General William King IV, commanding general, 20th CBRNE


command, talks to Gwyn Winfield about working with combatant commanders (COCOMs), states and research agencies


The most respectable arguments


GW: I find it difficult to talk to any of the commanding generals (CG) of the 20th without mentioning the shift in aim point. Currently you would have to go back 30 years to find a time when chemical weapons (CW) were as normalised as they are now. Since you have to deal with the perennial shortage of manpower, budget and time, how do you, as CG, decide where, on the raft of possibilities, the aim point should be?


WK: We continue with what we started. We need to recognise and accept that the threat has changed in the past few years, especially since ISIL has put theory into practice through its chlorine and mustard attacks and other experimentation. What we focussed on when I came into the command was training leaders and soldiers to be warrior scientists: masters of shoot, move, communicate, medicate, sustain themselves and apply technical ability in


a combined arms environment to get after the threat itself. What you are talking about is the environment; is it homeland, or abroad, is it large scale, clandestine, or counter terrorist? Those are just changes in the environment, the base threat is still CBRN weapons and their associated explosives being used as a means of terror and harm towards people or prohibiting access to equipment or infrastructure. How we apply our skill sets might be slightly different in the homeland compared to a combat environment, but that is nuanced, the basic principles are the same.


GW: But does mass affect that? Look at what is happening in Ukraine with concerns over potential Nato operations, or how about the Korean peninsula? Once you impose that level of agent, as opposed to a few kilogrammes here or there, doesn’t that change it? WK: It does, in terms of scale and magnitude. Would I do things differently if I went after a country with a small


“They see me rollin, They hatin, Tryin to catch me ridin' dirty…” ©DoD


CBRNe Convergence, Indianapolis Motor Speedway, Indiana, USA, 6 - 8 Nov 2017 www.cbrneworld.com/convergence2017 8 CBRNe WORLD June 2017 www.cbrneworld.com


CBRNeWORLD


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68