This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
industry research


Liz Smith reports on the key findings from the Working in Fitness 2010 survey T


hose working in the fitness industry are starting to feel the effects of the current economic climate. Levels


of pay have not generally increased over the past year, while training and development have also slowed down. However, fitness workers continue to be positive about the organisations they work for, with a stated intention to remain in the industry. These are the topline indications of


the seventh annual Working in Fitness Survey, developed by SkillsActive and the Register of Exercise Professionals (REPs) and conducted between May and August. We take a look in more detail.


pay & career prospects As seen in other industries, pay increases are on hold, employer contributions to training has reduced and the amount of training undertaken has shown the first signs of a fall. However, more fi tness workers are


recommending the organisation they work for than previously, and continue


to show a desire to remain in the fi tness industry in the long term. Sixty-eight per cent report an intention to stay in the sector for at least fi ve years, but there is still a quarter who don’t know how long they will stay. Factors that would make them leave include low pay, better career prospects elsewhere and personal reasons (each reported by two in fi ve respondents – see fi gure 1). Although these issues are consistent


across different types of employment, low pay and improved career prospects are more commonly cited by those working in permanent, full-time roles; they have a lesser impact on the self- employed. Positively, only 8 per cent and 7 per cent of the self-employed report a lack of work and rising costs, respectively, as signifi cant factors in the current economic climate. Pay, meanwhile, does not show signs


of improving: a higher proportion of fi tness workers than last year report the level unchanged, while those receiving an increase continues to fall – 24 per cent received a pay rise this year


Figure 1: Factors cited as reasons to leave the industry


Low pay compared to other industries


paths in other industries Unsociable hours


Poor training and development


Poor working conditions


End of contract/ redundancy


Leaving to raise family


Work pressure too much


Other personal reasons Better prospect/career


compared to 34 per cent last year. The increase that was received was most commonly 2.5 per cent or less. However, in spite of the current


pay situation, eight in 10 respondents are still happy to recommend the main organisation they work for to a friend. Although the private sector is slightly less likely to be referred, the fi gures suggest an improvement on last year. Given that the same issues appear to be present as those found in previous surveys, the improvement in recommendations may be due to workers simply being content to be in work at all at the moment. Areas that infl uence a


recommendation tend to be connected to working conditions and standards (see fi gure 2); remuneration and prospects for promotion or career development show the lowest satisfaction, regardless of whether an organisation would be recommended, which confi rms earlier fi ndings of factors that would make people consider leaving.


training & development Levels of training and development is not the most commonly quoted reason to leave the industry, but at the same time there is some evidence to suggest that it can benefit retention. When recommending an organisation to work for, those who have received the least number of training days are less likely to make a referral. Likewise those who intend to remain in the industry for a short time, or who do not recommend their employer, also more commonly report not receiving enough training. Those who intend to stay five or more


years in the sector undertook an average 5.5 days of training in the last year, while those staying only one year received 3.3 days’ training. This may be connected to the fact that training is most commonly paid for by


72 Read Health Club Management online at healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital november/december 2010 © cybertrek 2010


PERSPECTIVE


PERSONNEL


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84