This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
EDITOR’S LETTER


Subscriptions Denise Gildea +44 (0)1462 471930


Circulation Manager Michael Emmerson +44 (0)1462 471932


Editor


Kate Cracknell +44 (0)1462 471906


Editorial Director Liz Terry


+44 (0)1462 431385


Assistant Editor Katie Barnes


+44 (0)1462 471925


News Editor Tom Walker


+44 (0)1462 471934


Product Editor Kate Corney


+44 (0)1462 471927


Designer Clara Nicoll


+44 (0)1462 471910


Website Team Dean Fox


+44 (0)1462 471900 Emma Harris


+44 (0)1462 471921 Tim Nash


+44 (0)1462 471917


Michael Paramore +44 (0)1462 471926


Publisher Jan Williams


+44 (0)1462 471909


Sales John Challinor +44 (0)1202 742968


Astrid Ros +44 (0)1462 471911


Stephanie Rogers +44 (0)1462 471903 Julie Badrick


+44 (0)1462 471919


Financial Administrator Denise Gildea +44 (0)1462 471930


Credit Controller Rebekah Scott +44 (0)1462 733477


The Leisure Media Company Ltd, Portmill House, Portmill Lane, Hitchin, Hertfordshire SG5 1DJ UK


April 2013 © Cybertrek 2013


Strength in numbers


What might the gym of the future look like? Are we reaching a point where group exercise – far from being a mere complementary offering sitting alongside the gym in a full-service club – has actually become a strong proposition in its own right? And if so, what models might operators consider to ensure they tap into this? There’s certainly a lot of buzz around group exercise these days,


from virtual classes and gym floor team training to standalone ‘microgyms’ (see p47, and HCM May 12, p3 and p28) – not forgetting the ongoing enthusiasm for Zumba, which won the John McCarthy Industry Visionary Award at IHRSA this year (see p22). When you combine all that with the potential of group exercise to boost both retention and revenues, now certainly seems to be the time for all operators – from full-service to low-cost – to be reviewing their offering in this area. So what are the options, and how can operators implement these cost-effectively? Team training programmes are one possibility for existing clubs, with clear opportunities to drive secondary spend. “Gyms must charge for team training,” says Phillip Mills of Les Mills International, whose GRIT Series of HIT programming sits firmly within this category. “But it needs a separate studio, and you can’t call the sessions ‘classes’ – millennials see these as things their parents did.” Meanwhile, virtual classes offer a cost-


All the evidence suggests that, provided the right model is selected, gyms could benefi t in terms of both revenue and retention from giving their group exercise offering a bit of TLC


effective way of developing a group exercise offering, whether to give more choice during off-peak periods, to enhance live classes, or to make up the entirety of a studio timetable in clubs where the model doesn’t allow for a live offering. Operators already using a virtual


system even credit the all-day availability of group exercise with a rise in membership sales (see p58). But for would-be operators starting from scratch, the standalone model is also worthy of consideration.


Much has been said about the microgym, but we’re also witnessing a new take on group exercise-only venues: less the specialist, one-activity venue, more a standalone version of the diverse class offering found in full-service clubs. With the news that Fitness First Middle East was launching such a studio, we recently asked if this approach represented the future of fitness (see HCM Feb 13, p28). The founders of 30-Minute Fitness certainly think so: this new franchise, which launches in the UK this month, focuses exclusively on group exercise, with franchisees able choose from a portfolio of modules, from cycling to TRX to circuits. And the numbers stack up for the standalone model, with minimal investment in kit, the option to


charge a premium and, anecdotally at least, more loyal customers than gym-only members – anecdotes that look set to be given the weight of fact later this year in new research from Melvyn Hillsdon and TRP. But however operators choose to enhance their group exercise offering, there’s an important


consideration for all UK gyms: the change to the PPL licence that takes effect on 1 May, and that places responsibility for music usage in the hands of the operator (see HCM Feb 13, p24). Tariffs are also rising, and clubs hoping to boost their class timetable will need to factor this into their budgeting. Nevertheless all the evidence suggests that, provided the right model is selected, gyms could benefit in terms of both revenue and retention from giving their group exercise offering a bit of TLC.


Kate Cracknell, Editor – katecracknell@leisuremedia.com / twitter: @HealthClubKate To share your thoughts on this topic, visit www.healthclubmanagement.co.uk/blog


health club www.healthclubmanagement.co.uk management APRIL 2013 NO 201


PCTs to CCGs EVERYONE’S TALKING ABOUT...


How will the new public health set-up affect our sector?


TECHNOLOGY EDITION


going virtual


Should your club be considering virtual group exercise?


The Quantifi ed Self


Tapping into the ‘DIY health’ trend


CIRCADIAN


RHYTHMS IS THERE A


‘CORRECT’ TIME TO EXERCISE?


DENNIS PELLIKAAN


The director and co-owner of Pellikaan on driving revenue through a rental model


Read Health Club Management online: www.healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital


Health Club Management is IHRSA’s European Strategic Media Partner


health club management Follow us on twitter @healthclubmag


NEWS AND JOBS UPDATED DAILY ON THE INTERNET leisureopportunities.co.uk CONTACT US TEL +44 (0)1462 471915 EMAIL: theteam@leisuremedia.com


Read Health Club Management online at healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital 3


INTERVIEW


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92