SEPTEMBER 2012 THE RIDER /37
Equine Canada Creates Task Force on FEI Hypersensitivity Protocol
Ottawa, ON - Equine Canada (EC) today announced it has requested its Sport Council to strike a Hypersensitivity Protocol Task Force. The objective of the Task Force will be to review the International Equestrian Federation’s Protocol for Thermography and Clinical Examination (Hypersensitivity of legs) to ascertain, from the perspective of Canada’s equestrian sport commu- nity, if the protocol and its application are achiev- ing the intended outcomes in an equitable and effective manner.
“We made a commitment to our athletes and our members that we would undertake a review,” states Equine Canada President Mike Gallagher. “We are honouring that commitment.” During the 2012 London Games, the Canadi- an Olympic Show Jumping Team suffered a seri- ous handicap when Victor, Tiffany Foster’s mount, was disqualified from competing on August 5 under the International Equestrian Fed- eration’s (FEI) hypersensitivity protocol. An official communication issued by the FEI read: “The Veterinary Commission have stated that the horse has an area of inflammation and sensitivity on the forelimb just above the hoof. There is no accusation of malpractice, but the horse has been deemed unfit to compete by the Ground Jury.” Equine Canada also firmly stated that there was no accusation of any wrongdoing on the part of Tiffany Foster nor any member of the Canadian Team, and that further discussion regarding the FEI’s Hypersensitivity Protocol was needed. “Victor sustained a superficial cut on the front of the left front coronet band,” stated Cana- dian Olympic Team Veterinarian for Jumping Dr. Sylvie Surprenant, the next day following Vic- tor’s disqualification. “In our opinion the horse was fit to compete as he showed no signs of lame- ness. However the FEI hypersensitivity protocol is such that if the horse is sensitive to the touch, regardless of the cause, the horse is disqualified.
While the FEI rules for the hypersensitivity proto- col were followed, we believe that there should be a review of this protocol.”
Since its introduction following the 2008 Beijing Olympics, a number of international hors- es have been disqualified from competition as a result of the protocol, including McLain Ward’s Sapphire (USA) at the 2010 World Cup Finals - a decision which was further investigated by the FEI and resulted in a review of the hypersensitivi- ty protocol.
The creation and work of the Task Force will be overseen by Co-chairs Kerri McGregor, Canadian Equestrian Team Leader and Chair of Sport Council, and Mark Samuel, Canada’s elect- ed representative to Group IV of the FEI, member of Equine Canada’s Sport Council and former Chair of Jump Canada.
“In the next few weeks, as the Co-chairs of the Task Force, we will be recruiting a knowl- edgeable, proactive committee membership and firmly establishing our goals and objectives,” states Mark Samuel, also a former member of the Canadian Equestrian Show Jumping Team, repre- senting Canada in six Nations’ Cups. “Equine Canada looks forward to presenting our recommendations to the international commu- nity for consultation and discussion, and to work globally with the FEI towards improving the hypersensitivity protocol and its goals to protect horse welfare and fair play,” added Mr. Gallagher.
Equine Canada will endeavour to share progress reports from the Task Force leading up to its final report, and as well as future actions undertaken in the international equestrian com- munity.
To read more about the FEI’s hypersensitivi- ty testing protocol, please click here.
http://bit.ly/TXsx3q
J'Equine Sport Inc's three websites have been nominated as
Canadian website business of the year!
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64