Index
Page numbers for entries occurring in figures are suffixed by f, those for entries occurring in notes by n, and those for entries in tables by t.
ADP. See Agricultural Development Program Advisory services: demand-driven, 8, 9, 52, 60, 63; demand for, 26, 27, 52–57, 53t, 58t, 59–60, 63–64; elite capture of, 9; in Fadama II, 8, 52–57, 63; in Fadama III, 64; funding of, 9, 54; impact of Fadama II on demand for, 26, 52–57, 53t, 58t, 59; mass media delivery of, 54–57; medium-term review of, 9; pluralistic approach to, 9, 51–52, 60; providers of, 9, 51–52, 54, 55t, 56t, 59; spillover effects of, 54; supply-driven, 51, 57, 60; user fees for, 52, 54
Agricultural Development Program (ADP), 51, 54, 59, 60
Agricultural Development Project Executive Committee, 6
Agroecological zones: income impact of Fadama II in, 42, 42t, 44t, 45, 46, 62; productive-asset acquisition in, 29, 31, 32t, 34t; spillover effects of Fadama II in, 47, 48t; of states, 12; technology adoption in, 59
Agroprocessing equipment, 31, 46. See also Postproduction activities Assets, productive. See Productive assets Asset terciles: income impact of Fadama II by, 43t, 44t, 45–46, 61–62, 63; initial conditions of, 46, 62; productive-asset acquisition by, 29–30, 31, 33t, 35t, 37, 61; spillover effects of Fadama II by, 48t; technology adoption by, 59
Average effect of the treatment on the treated (ATT): definition of, 17; for Fadama II impacts, 19; for household income, 17–18; for spillover effects, 24; standard error of, 25–26
Beard, V., 2
Beneficiaries: characteristics of, 67–68t; decisionmaking by, 5; productive-asset acquisition contributions of, 8, 38–40; propensity score matching of, 18–19; unobservable characteristics of, 19; women as, 7, 24. See also Targeting
74
Capacity-building support, 8 CDD. See Community-driven development Chase, R., 1 Cleaver, F., 1
Community-driven development (CDD): challenges of, 1–2, 64; decisionmaking in, 5; multiple constraints addressed in, xiv, 64; scholarship on, 1–2; social inclusiveness of, 1; targeting in, 1–2; use of approach, xiii, 1, 5
Conflicts among resource users, 4, 8, 16 Conning, J., 2
Consumption expenditures: data collection, 21, 24; distribution of, 48, 49t
Credit sources: access to, 38, 39t, 62; Fadama Users’ Equity Fund, 62; informal, 38, 40; local schemes, 40; microfinance, 40, 62; private sector, 38
Crop production: conflicts with pastoralists, 8; incomes from, 27. See also Production technologies
Dasgupta, A., 2 DD. See Double-difference estimator Democratic institutions, 2, 6, 7 Distributional effects. See Income distribution Double-difference (DD) estimator, 16, 19–21 Dry savannah zone: income impact of Fadama II in, 42; states included in, 12; technology adoption in, 59. See also Agroecological zones
Ecological zones. See Agroecological zones Economic interest groups (EIGs): asset ownership by, 28; Fadama Community Associations and, 6; Fadama User Groups as, 5; membership determinants, 21, 25, 66t; selection criteria for, 6–7; women’s, 31, 46
Education: of economic interest group participants, 25; technology adoption and demand and, 57
EIGs. See Economic interest groups Elderly. See Vulnerable groups
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93