This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
»


CHROMATOGRAPHY


»


analyzed with coupled chiral and achiral columns. The recommended process for a screen to achieve a one-step chiral/achiral separation is performed by using conditions from the optimal isocratic chiral method (with acquisition time doubled from 5 to 10 minutes) applied to each of the four diff erent achiral columns in series with an Amylose chiral column (see Figure 3). The retention of enantiomers and that of the achiral compound are aff ected diff erently by the achiral column upstream of the CSP. While chiral selectivity is maintained after elution from the coupled columns, the unique selectivity of each achiral column results in a diff erent chromatographic profi le. Figure 3 data for the Nitro column shows Chlormezanone and Chrysin both retained more strongly than with other achiral columns applied, Chrysin so strongly retained it does not elute with the same isocratic method. DEAP also strongly retains Chrysin although it elutes within the 10-minute run time. With the 4-EP and Imidazole columns, Chrysin is less retained but coelutes with the second-eluting enantiomer of Chlormezanone. However with the HILIC column coupled in this example, there is good selectivity for all three peaks. With a suitable preparative scale up, enantiomers of Chlormezanone may be effi ciently isolated free from contamination with Chrysin.


Coupled Column Screen with Synthetic Racemate and Achiral Impurity


The result of a case in which the achiral/chiral column screen was performed is illustrated in Figure 4.


additive) + 80% CO2 A signifi cant achiral impurity


was present in this sample and insuffi cient separation was found in chiral screening. From the screen, the best isocratic method for chiral resolution was 20% methanol (20 mM NH3


on a


4.6 x 100 mm immobilized Amylose 3,5-dimethylphenyl carbamate column.


Using these conditions and coupling each of the four selected achiral phases with the CSP, an advantageous selectivity of


Figure 4. Comparison of 4 diff erent achiral columns coupled with immobilized Amylose 3,5-dimethylphenyl carbamate for chemistry chiral sample with large impurity using the isocratic method 20% methanol (20 mM NH3) / 80% CO2


at 4 mL/min.


enantiomers from the achiral impurity was sought. The zoomed-in chromatogram view Figure 4 reveals varying selectivities for Silica, Pyridyl Amide and HILIC, but none completely resolving the impurity from enantiomers. However the bottom chromatogram representing a coupling of the imidazole phase with immobilized Amylose reveals baseline resolution of both enantiomers from the impurity, the latest eluting peak. This is exactly the result sought from the extra screening step allowing the purifi cation of these enantiomers to be achieved in one preparative step.


Preparative SFC Comparison – Coupled vs. Two-stage Separation


To illustrate the impact of coupling columns at the preparative stage, the racemic pharmaceutical compound Diperodon was spiked or “contaminated” with 10% caff eine by weight.


The coupled column


analytical screening indicated an achiral resolution was possible at conditions which resolved the enantiomers, so a preparative scale SFC experiment with relevant columns was carried out. At the top of Figure 5 a preparative mode stacked injection sequence [12] designed to achieve a fast cycle chiral resolution for the mixture is shown. It is accepted that no achiral resolution would be achieved in this step so with favorable chiral separation conditions for an immobilized Cellulose tris (3,5)-dimethylphenyl carbamate column, the caff eine peak mostly overlaps with the front edge of the fi rst eluting enantiomer using this method (see Figure 5). The collected fraction 1 required evaporation after collection and another preparative process to resolve caff eine from enantiomer 1 isolated in the chiral separation step. On the right in the fi gure is the achiral repurifi cation trace of fraction 1 which was required following the chiral-only separation initially performed.


Figure 3. Comparison of 5 diff erent achiral columns coupled with Amylose tris [(S)-α-methylbenzylcarbamate for chiral/ achiral separation of Chlormezanone with Chrysin “impurity” using isocratic method 25% ethanol (20 mM NH3) / 75% CO2


4 mL/min. at


All the time taken for the second step is unnecessary utilizing the coupled column concept in this example. Using these same mobile phase conditions and cycle time, but with a 15 cm Pyridyl Amide column coupled with a 20 mm length of 0.020” stainless steel tubing to the 25 cm immobilized Cellulose column, the chromatographic


94 | | September/October 2013 - 15TH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156