Briefing
crowdfunding is that it creates a strong network of support for a start-up.
One of the main benefits of O
nce upon a time, funding a start- up business was done by using savings or getting a bank loan. Asking friends or family was the next port of call. Perhaps then an entrepreneur might consider pitching to an angel investor or venture capital firm. Dragons’ Den, anyone? Fail- ing these options, and with the economic down- turn causing many institutions to tighten their purse strings, it may be necessary to find alter- native sources of funding to get a start-up off the ground. Now, capitalizing on the reach of online so-
cial networks, a new and increasingly popular way to fund a small business has emerged. The term ‘crowdfunding’ was first used in around 2006, and since then, close to 500 active crowd- funding websites have become available to help entrepreneurs inject life into their small busi- nesses. These web sites empower anyone, any- where in the world to raise money for any idea. Crowdfunding is bringing about rapid changes in the world of entrepreneurial finance. Crowdfunding refers to the collective effort
of individuals who network and pool their re- sources to support efforts initiated by other peo- ple or organizations. It is used in support of a broad range of activities, including start-up com- pany funding, software development, disaster relief, citizen journalism, support of artists by fans, political campaigns, movie making, in- ventions development and scientific research. Led by the recent success of high-profile and high-capital funding campaigns on crowdfund- ing websites KickStarter and Indiegogo as well as the many thousands of smaller projects,
crowdsourcing.org predicts that the amount of money raised by crowdfunding platforms dur- ing 2012 will reach £1,735 million, up 91% since 2011. Crowdfunding has the potential to reach a scale that will completely change the landscape for start-up financing.
New European Economy
The aforementioned Kickstarter is the biggest fish in the crowdfunding pond. The US-based platform, which has just launched in the UK, has seen over $350 million pledged by more than 2.5 million people, funding more than 30,000 creative projects. Unlike traditional methods of backing new companies, investors on Kick- starter do not gain a share of the company, nor do they have any say in its future operation. Although originally launched as a site for
artistic projects such as plays or film-making, Kickstarter has become known for attracting a large number of products targeted at the tech- nology community. Every project creator sets a funding goal and deadline. If the project suc- ceeds in reaching its goal, all backers' credit cards are charged when the deadline expires. If the project falls short of its target, nobody is charged. Project creators keep total ownership of their work. Kickstarter, which charges 5% commission, cannot be used to offer financial returns or equity or to solicit loans. Similar websites such as Indiegogo also offer crowdfunding to UK businesses, but they have yet to gain the same widespread appeal as the American site. Indiegogo allows people to raise money for absolutely anything, using an op- tional keep-what-you-raise model with higher fees as well as an all-or-nothing approach with lower fees. Indiegogo's biggest campaign to date saw a man fascinated by physicist and inventor Nikola Tesla raise more than a million dollars in just a few weeks to see that a museum is founded in Tesla’s name.
According to Slava Rubin, CEO and co-
founder of Indiegogo, people contribute to the campaigns for several reasons. Firstly, they care about the person and the cause. Secondly, they want a perk related to the project they are help- ing to fund. Thirdly, they become part of a com- munity, knowing that they helped make something happen. Lastly, people want to profit.
This is not legal now, but it will be in the US in 2013 with the implementation of the JOBS Act, which was passed in April 2012. One of the main benefits of crowdfunding is that it creates a strong network of support for a start-up. Investors are likely to become ambas- sadors for a brand, promoting it among their contacts, tracking its progress and becoming re- turning customers themselves. Supporters of the crowdfunding approach argue that it allows good ideas that do not fit the pattern required by conventional financiers to break through and at- tract cash through the astuteness of the crowd. They also identify a potential outcome of crowd- funding as an exponential increase in available venture capital.
On the other hand, there is always a risk of copyright infringement when a concept is re- leased into a public domain. Entrepreneurs are exposed to the risk of their idea being imitated and developed ahead of them by better-financed competitors. Moreover, it sometimes proves eas- ier to raise the money for a project than to make the project a success. Managing communica- tions with a large number of possibly disap- pointed investors and supporters can be a substantial and unpleasant task.
Although crowdfunding can provide an ex-
cellent opportunity for small businesses, it should not be entered into lightly, and to be suc- cessful, it requires a careful strategy. Crowd- funding functions best for start-ups that have a story to tell, whether a personal reason for start- ing the business, a passionate vision for what it could become or a social mission. People have to feel inspired to invest, so a charismatic pitch is required to get potential investors fired up. Al- ternatively, a display of evidence of outstanding innovation is necessary. For those with a mun- dane or complicated concept that the public will struggle to connect to, crowdfunding may not be the right option.
11
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136