This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
28 INSIDE TRADER


Great Scott! Some toy inventors have been surprised by their share of a product’s profits…


The invention test


Our industry thrives on new and innovative product concepts, but often inventors don’t have a clue how to best approach firms in our market. ToyNews’ Inside Trader Steve Reece explains to newcomers just how to prepare for those important pitches to toy companies…


A SONG lyric from a misspent youth comes to mind when I consider the role of inventors in the toy industry: “Very much maligned and misunderstood”. The Shamen may have been referring to something very different, but nevertheless inventors are underappreciated. Running through my own career sales record, over half of all products sold were inventor-originated. In-house R&D is still a critical function, and sometimes that ‘out of the box’ thinking reaps rewards. Often, we start to follow fixed formulae for successful product. Inventors don’t have that. They create with a pinch of inspiration, an observation of how people play or another creative impulse.


Some professional inventors get very close to what firms are looking for, and begin to blend the best of both internal company perspective and external outlook. This can create powerful product concepts. This leads me to the most common


gripe about new inventors: they have no understanding or grounding in commercial reality. As such, their naivety makes them at best difficult to deal with, and at worst a nuisance. I remember one particular encounter on the last day of Toy Fair one year. An inexperienced inventor caught me at a slow moment, and after asking me what ‘cut’ the inventor of


misfortune of being on the receiving end of. When I struggled to understand a concept that even Stephen Hawking would fail to comprehend, he became at first animated, then very aggressive, suggesting it was my fault I couldn’t get it. It took a considerable amount of effort (threats) to persuade him to move along quietly.


When I struggled to understand a concept that even Stephen Hawking would fail to comprehend, he became at first animated, then aggressive.


a new product gets, reacted with indignation and anger when he found out most inventors would be lucky to get more than five per cent. My other favourite was a gentleman who invented a very unimpressive concept. As well as unexciting, it was also exceedingly convoluted. That, combined with the worst presentation style I’ve had the


The reality is sometimes such naïve souls have struck gold. So the question becomes: do you have the stamina and inclination to sift through hundreds of concepts, poorly managed presentations and waste hefty amounts of time and emotional energy? If not, then you could always rely on professional inventors, plus inventors’ agents to filter out the


misguided and the maniacal. But where’s the fun in that? For new inventors reading this, these tips may help. First, be clear on why your product will surmount the two major challenges new products face: why will a retailer put your product on the shelf versus thousands of established, proven products they can choose from? And why will droves of consumers do the same? If you can’t answer these, you aren’t ready to pitch to toy firms. Secondly, understand the business model of toy companies. Accounts are published and easy to find. Firms invest large amounts of money in new products and with considerable risk. They take your concept and commercialise it, which is a much more complicated process than you might perceive, for much lower profit levels than you might expect. Finally, seek out inventors’ agents. They will take a cut, but your chances of placing a product successfully are vastly higher with their assistance.


Steve Reece is a leading brand marketing consultant in the toy and games industry. Contact him via steve.reece@vicientertainment.co.uk, or see his blog at www.stevenreece.com


SEPTEMBER 2012


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84