Development finance
Dealing with change Developing the lender-intermediary relationship
Noel Meredith, Director at United Trust Bank, discusses the changing role of intermediaries within the development finance sector
The role of the intermediary is one that has developed significantly over recent years both in terms of the relationship they have with their clients and with the lenders they work with. This has certainly been the case within development finance. As one of the few lenders which has remained lending throughout the credit crisis we have noticed numerous changes.
In the period prior to the credit crunch there existed a vibrant economic environment with funding widely available and so often the primary role of the intermediary was to filter the myriad funding offers available to their client. However, as the credit crunch began to bite and funding became more restricted there was increasing pressure on developers and their intermediary advisers to not only find the right funding deal, but in some cases, to find any funding at all.
Disappearing funding lines During this period there have been casualties on all sides with lenders, developers and intermediaries all feeling the pinch. In our sector it became increasingly obvious that we were one of the few active lenders remaining in the development finance sector. The loss of many specialist lenders and lack of appetite from High Street banks drastically reduced the number of reliable sources of finance for mid-range developers borrowing up to £5 million in any sort of regular volume.
This increase in the difficulty to secure funding for a project put pressure on intermediaries as their developer clients were eager to obtain new funds or to refinance an existing project, but perhaps did not fully understand the changes that had occurred in terms of available LTV and pricing. As a result of this many developers became convinced that funding on “traditional terms” was available
somewhere, and so started shopping around numerous intermediaries for the one (or anyone) that could secure them the funding that they required on the terms they were used to.
One of the core facets of an intermediary’s relationship with a client is their ability to get a deal and so the relationship that an intermediary had with lenders became a crucial selling point. In a vibrant market, brokers theoretically had access to a wide number of lenders but in practice regularly did the bulk of their business with those lenders they found delivered best. Therefore, it was often the case that different brokers would produce different funding solutions, often bringing a new lender into the reckoning.
Fast forward to a post-credit crunch world where just a few lenders remain active. All the active brokers will be in regular touch with the few lenders remaining. In these circumstances it is unlikely that instructing multiple brokers will tease out a new lender to seal the deal.
Displaying a professional approach To illustrate the point, over the past year we have experienced the same project being offered to us over a period of many months by a series of different brokers. The terms we are prepared to offer do not change so at best the developer has merely delayed the start of his project. At present there is no shortage of projects for development lenders to look at. We are naturally inclined to focus our efforts on the new, fresh projects and not keep revisiting projects. The professional broker will recognise this and check what other mandates have been offered and lenders approached. He will also counsel the borrower on the terms that are realistically available. In 2012 we all need to focus on the deals that can be done and avoid wasting our time on proposals that either cannot be financed or
where the developer’s expectations are unrealistic.
We have a tremendous relationship with the intermediaries with whom we do business with and this is primarily based on the fact that they use their knowledge and experience about the deals that they present to us. We welcome proposals for developments in areas where the market can be proven to be active and prices reasonably stable. This attention to detail and appreciation of a local housing market is something that intermediaries can do incredibly well and makes the decision of the lender far easier as the ‘exit’ route is clearly visible and realistic. In today’s market it is a sad reality that first-time buyers and second stepper properties are difficult everywhere because of the mortgage deposit trap and a realisation from an intermediary that this will form part of a lender’s decision process will impress both the developer and the lender.
Partnership approach
Another change that we have noticed over recent years is the genuine partnership that exists between the lender, the developer and the intermediary. Successful intermediaries do not act as gatekeepers or create barriers between a lender or their client, instead recognising that a quality lender can benefit their customers by offering advice and helping them do the right deal and not just any deal. We personally visit every site with the potential borrowers which we hope demonstrates our commitment to the relationship we have with both our clients, the borrower and the intermediary.
The role of the intermediary will continue to be vital in the development finance market and the winners will be those that form the closest bonds with lenders, establishing a mandate to present cases based on knowledge, expertise and realism.
March 2012 Business Moneyfacts ® 15
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124