This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
RAIL SAFETY


F How does Cosalt


or end users working in the rail industry the provision of quality


high visibility clothing and its managed aftercare is vital to ensure they are protected and their PPE remains in an efficient state and in good repair. Within the demanding environments in which essential outdoor work is carried out, quality garments should be selected and assigned which are ‘fit for purpose’ as well as hard wearing and reliable.


The tri-partnership between Cosalt, Gore and PHS Besafe is providing such a service to end users in the rail industries. Quality is assured and


maintained throughout, starting with technical fabric production, garment design and construction through to laundering, inspection and garment return.


Cost savings in this current economic climate are always welcome which is why this new alliance is set to be well received within the rail industry. Based on standard calculations of two years supply and usage of disposable jackets vs. laundered Cosalt GORE-TEX® jackets,


keep you safe? Three partners – one goal


savings during this period range from £35-£145 per worker.


The purchase of 12 high visibility disposable jackets costs around £240-£360 per worker, whereas the purchase of one high visibility Cosalt GORE-TEX® jacket combined with 12 washes via PHS Besafe will only cost around £205- £215 over the same two year period. In addition, Cosalt GORE-TEX® jackets can last significantly longer than the two year period if properly maintained meaning further financial savings.


Additional benefits to the customer of this tri partnership system include savings from the hidden costs of invoicing, handling, dispatch, storage and landfill charges. By investing and maintaining in one durable garment a company will also reduce its carbon footprint.


Investment in a quality garment also provides the wearer with the advanced comfort and protection provided by Cosalt GORE-TEX® workwear, allowing end users to work with confidence even in the most hostile of environments.


No cable - no problem


I


ncreasing level crossing safety is an important objective of rail operators. There are many dangers associated with level crossings, particularly when crossings are located in rural areas. Hearing trains approaching can often be difficult for users of crossings for various reasons; windy weather, MP3 players, vehicle music, mobile telephones will affect the ability to hear approaching trains.


Also, weather conditions such as snow, rain and fog may affect the warning a user receives that a train is on the way. In some places, bridges, buildings and embankments may restrict view.


All these parameters, coupled with often user complacency, are potential dangers for a pedestrian, cyclist or driver who needs to cross a railway line.


Every year, people are killed and injured in accidents at level crossings and the provision of a telephone would help to make them safer. Infrastructure restrictions, difficulties involving the provision of a telephone i.e. no cable or power, coupled with the high cost of installing and maintaining assets, in often


FOR MORE INFORMATION


DAC Limited T: 01282 447000 W: www.daclimited.co.uk


60 rtm Oct/Nov 10


remote locations, has prevented rail operators from providing a telephone terminal at these crossings.


Until recently, the technology has not been readily available for manufacturers to provide a solution. DAC Limited has developed a solution that could be the answer.


Due to trial this year, the RA708-GSM/GSM-R telephone is a standalone device that can be located anywhere there is sufficient GSM or GSM-R coverage.


No power, no cables, no infrastructure, no problem! Installation is simple, and the telephone is designed to be user friendly, mimicking existing telephones that are already widely used on crossings.


The RA708-GSM/GSM-R has a certain amount of on- board intelligence, providing internal health status checks to ensure serviceability levels are maintained.


Reporting via SMS, should there be a problem, before the problem turns into an incident.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100