This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LONDON UNDERGROUND


L LU to review non-operational staff roles to


further reduce costs


ondon Underground has started consulting with trades unions


over necessary changes to non- operational functions, to ensure that the company is operating as efficiently as possible to deliver customer services, the vital Tube upgrade programme and the best possible value for taxpayers and fare payers.


LU is reviewing all non-frontline services to ensure the right levels of resources are in place, and to protect the twin priorities of delivering excellent daily customer service and the Tube Investment Programme, so vital to support the economy and growth of London and the UK as a whole.


The review will reflect recent changes which have led to


can be. London Underground is vital to London and the wider UK economy and we must have an organisation fit to deliver our priorities – excellent daily customer services and the delivery of the biggest Tube Investment Programme in our history.


© Transport for London 2005


reductions in activity in some back-office areas, such as the changes in the formal contractual arrangements following the acquisition of Tube Lines.


Customer facing and frontline roles, such as train operators, station and maintenance staff are not affected by this review.


Around 400 permanent


employees in back-office roles will be affected and a similar number of back-office posts which are currently vacant or filled by non-permanent staff will also be affected.


Mike Brown, managing director of London Underground, said: “Like all organisations we continue to face financial pressures and have a duty to be as effective and efficient as we


“This must be our focus. No customer facing or frontline train, station, line control or maintenance roles are part of this review.


“We have committed to carrying out these changes as soon as possible to reduce uncertainty for those affected.”


London Underground has written to all its trades unions today to outline the proposals.


32 rtm


Oct/Nov 10


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100