B2
Worst Week inWashington
The Fix’s By Chris Cillizza F
ormer presidents, like ex-girlfriends and ex-boy- friends, tend to benefit from the rose-tinted glasses of our collective memory.
The further removed a president is from the Oval Office,
the more the public remembers the good times they had together and forgets about the disagreements. And ex- presidents, freed from the burdens of handling the world’s problems, tend to pursue feel-good humanitarian work once they leave Washington — a career choice that virtually ensures higher approval ratings. It’s happened to Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan and nearly every other modern president. Heck, even George W. Bush is starting to be viewed more positively these days. Jimmy Carter, the peanut farmer from Georgia, was perhaps the prototypical example of this phenomenon —
never popular during his single term in office but beloved as a diplomat and habitat-builder once out of it. Until last week, that is. Carter started the week by accusing the late senator
Ted Kennedy of purposefully tanking Carter’s health-care bill in the late 1970s. “He did not want to see me have a major success in that realm of life,” the former president said in an interview for CBS’s “60 Minutes.” (Kennedy lost to Carter in the 1980 Democratic presidential primary.) Then, in an interview with NBC’s Brian Williams, Carter,
who was promoting the publication of his White House di- ary, said that his “role as a former president is probably superior to that of other presidents.” He later recanted somewhat, issuing a clarifying statement that “for 27 years the Carter Center has provided me with superior op- portunities to do good.” Um, okay. Jimmy Carter, for speaking ill of the dead and tooting your own horn loudly on national TV, you had the Worst Week in Washington. Congrats, or something.
Have a candidate for the Worst Week in Washington? E-mail
chris.cillizza@
wpost.com with your nominees.
B
KLMNO
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2010 Myths about Facebook 5 by David Kirkpatrick M the 61 ⁄2
ovies often have Web sites, but it’s not so often that Web sites have movies. Facebook, of course, is not just any Web site; in years since founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg
started the social networking service in his Harvard dorm room, it has acquired 500 million active users worldwide. It may be the fastest-growing company in history. And now, yes, it is the inspiration for a movie, “The Social Network,” opening Oct. 1. Even before Hollywood got involved, however, Facebook was the subject of quite a bit of lore — not all of it true.
Facebook is used mostly by college kids.
1
When Zuckerberg started Facebook in the spring of 2004, it was just for his classmates —
ERIK S. LESSER / AP The Great Migration’s great diversity migration from B1
in.” In other words, black migrants shared a common culture that was ani- mated by the promise and possibility of the American dream. The author tells the migration story through the portraits of three people whose sojourns began in the 1930s and ’40s: George Swanson Starling, a Flori- da fruit-picker who found his way to Harlem; Robert Joseph Pershing Foster, a Louisianan and Morehouse College graduate who went to Los Angeles to es- tablish his medical practice; and Ida Mae Gladney, a married-at-16 Missis- sippi sharecropper who settled in Chi- cago. In some ways, all three found what
they were looking for. Starling, who abandoned Florida to escape retribu- tion after he organized fellow fruit- pickers, found work as a train atten- dant; he gleefully advised passengers of their right to sit in desegregated coach- es and reveled in the wondrous Harlem life of the 1940s. The charming and am-
bitious Foster, a surgeon who began his career collecting urine samples door to door for an insurance company, built a lucrative practice that included such cli- ents as the musician Ray Charles (who wrote a song about him). Gladney, whose family of five had been crammed into a cabin in Mississippi’s backwoods, found work as a nurse’s aide and be- came a blue-collar, churchgoing home- owner with enough space for her and her husband’s multigenerational family. However, personal triumph was ac- companied by pain and tragedy — the
The refusal to be captives in the South may have saved their lives — and perhaps their souls.
seeds of which were not brought from the South but awaited the migrants in the North. Foster’s relentless climb up the social ladder, in part an effort to compensate for the racial humiliation he met in California, created psycholog- ical wounds that alienated him from his wife and family. Two of Starling’s chil- dren became addicted to drugs in a de- teriorating Harlem. And soon after the Gladneys moved into their home, whites fled the neighborhood, eventual- ly relegating the area to urban blight and forcing Ida to live out her old age as “an eyewitness to a war playing out in the streets below her.” And yet, as becomes clear in this ex-
traordinary and evocative work, the re- fusal to be captives in the South may have saved their lives — and perhaps their souls. “If all of their dream does not come true,” wrote the Chicago De- fender, a newspaper that beckoned Southern blacks early in the migration, “enough will come to pass to justify their actions.”
bookworld@washpost.com
but that chapter lasted only a matter of months. The site opened to students with e-mail addresses from other colleges later that year, to high schoolers in 2005 and to all adults in 2006. While Facebook’s base still skews young, about two-thirds of its 134 million American members are older than 26. Outside the United States, Facebook’s fastest growth has been among middle-age women. In country after country, it has become so central to social life that if you are not on it — regardless of your age — you are probably not in very close contact with your friends. In my own research, for example, I have found that Facebook messaging is beginning to replace e-mail among the Italian educated elite and among businesspeople in Colombia. And in Indonesia, Facebook’s third-largest country, if you use the Internet you are almost certainly a member: Of the 30 million people online there, 27.8 million of them use Facebook.
Facebook keeps changing to help sell advertising.
2
Zuckerberg is constantly making changes to Facebook’s features and interface, and
some of these changes have left users with less control over how their personal data is displayed to the outside world. In one such instance late last year, each user’s list of friends was made public; the resulting outcry by privacy advocates and a small but vocal group of users forced Facebook to retreat this spring. The company’s critics presume that these changes reflect a profit motive — they note that exposing users’ data makes it easier for advertisers to target them. While it may, my many interviews with Zuckerberg suggest a different agenda. For one thing, he doesn’t seem to see ad revenue as an end in itself; he sees it as a way to pay the bills as he expands his service. (If his primary motivation were short-term financial success, he might have accepted Microsoft’s 2007 offer, which would have paid him, at age 23, more than $4 billion for his share of the company. He didn’t even consider it.)
Zuckerberg seems to see himself less as an entrepreneur than as a social revolutionary who is using his company as a lever to change the world. “Making the world more open and connected” is the company’s motto; for Zuckerberg, it is a mantra. He believes that Facebook offers people worldwide a broadcast platform, and he hopes they will use it to become more effective citizens. As a result, decisions at Facebook are calibrated not so much for short-term profitability as for their effect on extending the service to more users. Staffers unabashedly used the word “ubiquity” to describe the company’s goal to me. Zuckerberg’s fixation on constant
development is also motivated by a healthy dose of paranoia: Over the course of my conversations with him, it became clear that he believes that if Facebook ever stops changing, a smaller, nimbler competitor — something like Facebook once was — will sneak up and eat his lunch.
Facebook users are up in arms about privacy.
3 CHICAGO HISTORY MUSEUM VIA GETTY IMAGES Recent arrivals in Chicago in 1918. They were part of the Great Migration of African Americans from the South.
Outlook’s editors welcome comments and suggestions. Write to us at
outlook@washpost.com.
Some say they are, but actions speak louder than words, and Facebook has continued to grow through each privacy controversy. The biggest one took place in September 2006, when Facebook introduced its News Feed feature, which presents the latest information about each user to all of his or her friends. Although 10 percent of users initially joined Facebook groups protesting this change, the
on
washingtonpost.com
David Kirkpatrick will discuss this article
Wednesday at 11 a.m. at
washingtonpost.com/liveonline.
News Feed quickly became the most popular feature on the site. Today, it more or less defines Facebook. Another indication that most users
don’t care much about privacy is that so many of them accept friend requests from people they don’t know very well — if at all. This is in part because a culture of competition, driven by a desire to rack up the most friends, has caught hold among many users. Others are uncertain about whether they can politely decline such requests. Yet, becoming someone’s “friend” on Facebook typically means giving that person access to personal information. In an experiment, security firm Sophos invited Facebook users to befriend someone named Freddi Staur, whose profile contained almost no information but showed a photo of a small green plastic frog. The request was accepted by 41 percent of users.
Zuckerberg stole the idea for Facebook from other students at Harvard.
4
Whether he did is the dramatic question at the heart of “The Social Network,” based on Ben
Mezrich’s book “The Accidental Billionaires.” Zuckerberg briefly worked for a group of older students who were building an online social network they called Harvard Connection (later renamed ConnectU), but he launched his own site, which he originally dubbed Thefacebook, before they could complete theirs. The older students felt betrayed and filed a lawsuit against Zuckerberg, charging that he’d ripped off their idea. He settled the claim out of court, reportedly paying the students stock worth tens of millions of dollars. But a little context is helpful.
Zuckerberg and the older students were greatly influenced by services already in operation, including Friendster, which launched in March 2003. Moreover, social networks were appearing at colleges all over the country that school year, including at Yale, Columbia and Baylor. A sophisticated service called Club Nexus had launched at Stanford in 2001.
So while Zuckerberg might have borrowed some ideas from Harvard Connection, many of these ideas were already borrowed — from Friendster and Club Nexus.
Facebook could soon go the way of Friendster and MySpace.
find dates; MySpace (which launched in August 2003) was initially used for much the same purpose. Facebook, by contrast, was conceived as a much broader communication tool. Friendster and MySpace were never as technologically sophisticated as Facebook, nor did their leaders possess a fraction of Facebook’s paranoia about competitors. And neither of those services ever became nearly as large as Facebook. It is the largest service on the Internet by far in terms of hours of use, and it has become the world’s largest repository of photos; its users would be loathe to abandon all those pictures, since many don’t keep copies elsewhere. All this means that Facebook has grown into something much more than a fad. It may eventually be replaced by something else, but not without a fight.
5
David Kirkpatrick is the author of “The Facebook Effect: The Inside Story of the Company That Is Connecting the World.”
Friendster was created by a guy who said part of his motivation was to help people
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174