SUNDAY, MAY 30, 2010
PERSONAL FINANCE
Knowing financial adviser’s motives, expertise can pay dividends
by Bob Frick
W
hy do so many of us who seek advice about money shy away from asking the hard questions of financial
advisers? Maybe because money is such a taboo subject — after all, survey after survey finds that given a choice to discuss sex or money, more of us feel comfortable with pillow talk. But understanding your financial
adviser’s motives, expertise and methods is crucial to managing your wealth and will certainly help you sleep better during turbulent financial times. First check an adviser’s qualifications
and references. Then ask these key questions:
Do our goals match? If an adviser
works solely or partly on commission, you might have a problem. You can never be sure whether the investments the adviser is buying for your portfolio are the best he can find or the ones that generate the largest fees. When an adviser wants to swap a few mutual funds in and a few out, is he doing so to improve your performance or because he needs to score more commissions to make a car payment? The simplest way to unite your goals with those of your adviser is to pay a fee tied to the size of your portfolio — say, 1 percent of assets per year. When your portfolio goes up, and only when it goes up, so does your adviser’s compensation. Other methods that avoid conflicts of interest are to pay for advice by the plan, by the hour or by an annual retainer. But those don’t provide as much incentive for your adviser as a plan linked to assets.
How much will your services really
cost me? Your adviser’s fee is only a part of your costs. If your adviser trades securities often, brokerage commissions can add up. And maybe your adviser likes mutual funds or other investments with high annual expenses. Get an accounting of total annual fees and expenses for the adviser’s typical portfolio. A thrifty adviser can find plenty of cheap mutual funds and exchange-traded funds and won’t trade often, keeping the annual cost of your portfolio to well below 1 percent of assets (not including the adviser’s fee).
How do you measure
Thumbing nose over insurance
by Knight Kiplinger
Q
KIPLINGER / KIPLINGER
performance? This is definitely a question to ask upfront. At your annual checkup, your adviser can pull out all kinds of measures to make his performance look better than it really is. Decide what standards you’re going to use before turning over a penny. Be sure to ask current and former clients how their portfolios performed. Here’s our suggestion: Your portfolio should do at least as well at the market averages. So the portion of your portfolio in big U.S. companies should at least equal the performance of Standard & Poor’s 500. Likewise, the portions in small-company stocks, foreign stocks, bonds and so on should equal or better their market-average doppelganger. Equaling the averages is a
no-brainer; all your adviser has to do is invest in index funds. In fact, many advisers follow just that strategy. At any rate, studies have shown that your mix of assets is far more important in determining performance than the choice of individual funds or securities.
What do you know about me? Many
advisers use a “portfolio in a box” approach — that is, they figure that if you’re of a certain age and generate a certain amount of income, you should hold investments X, Y and Z. But the past decade has taught us
that we all come with biases that affect our comfort level with investments and
their performance. For example, some of us love risk, while others despise it. Plus, we put different priorities on different goals. A good adviser will ask you questions to divine your attitudes toward risk, different types of investments, your need for security and your priorities. Many will have you fill out questionnaires on those topics, although advisers should combine the surveys with heart-to-heart discussions. The payoff for spending time on such
discussions is a portfolio that reflects those variables.
Do you time the market? Most
advisers who try to time the market won’t admit to it, at least not in those words. Timing the market means trying to predict future movements of asset prices and moving money in and out of markets to take advantage of those predictions. Relatively few investors have done so successfully over long periods. If your adviser were one of them, she would probably be running a multibillion-dollar hedge fund. By asking an adviser about her
investment strategy and how it changes with developments in the markets, you’ll discover whether she’s a closet market timer. Watch out for an adviser who says, for example, that she thought foreign stocks were getting pricey so she shifted clients’ money from
overseas shares to commodities. Wholesale changes of that sort rarely pay off, and, if they’re done poorly, your portfolio could shrink faster than an igloo on Hawaii.
Do you take a holistic approach?
You might want your adviser just to manage your money. That’s fine. But to really take advantage of a pro’s expertise, you want someone who is versed in estate planning, insurance and a host of other areas that work best when orchestrated together. That includes estate planning, life and long-term-care insurance and investing for college.
How can you help me transition to
retirement? Making money grow is just half the challenge. A good adviser should lay out a strategy on how you’ll reduce risk in your portfolio as you approach retirement age, even if retirement is years away. The adviser should have a plan for
setting up various buckets of funds to meet your retirement income needs, including short-term liquid assets for immediate cash; fixed-interest investments, such as CDs or bond ladders, that you can use to replenish your cash bucket as needed and to shield you from having to sell stocks in a down market; and long-term assets invested for growth in a well-diversified portfolio.
—Kiplinger’s Personal Finance
My son is 27, and his employer, a small tech start-up, doesn’t offer health insurance. The company has fewer than 50
employees, so under the new health-care law, it won’t have to provide health coverage. My son can’t go back on my husband’s employer-paid policy because he’s past the age limit of 26. He makes good money, about $50,000 a year, but says he has no intention of buying individual health insurance — not even a catastrophic policy that would kick in if his medical bills were to get too high. My son figures he can always get insurance through one of the new high-risk pools if someday he gets really sick and needs it. And he points out that he won’t face a personal penalty for not having insurance until 2014, when it will likely be a painless $500 — a lot less than the cost of an individual policy. I feel it’s unethical of him to game
the system this way. What do you think?
I agree with you. Your son is doing well enough financially to take responsibility for his well-being by buying his coverage, which he may find quite affordable. I also believe that his employer, regardless of its exemption from the new employer-coverage mandate, should find a group policy that the company and its employees can afford. But that’s another issue.
A
Who does your son think should pay the bills for his unforeseen medical needs? You and your husband? The local hospital? A health insurer to whom he hasn’t paid any premiums before his need arose? A government agency? Or is he planning to save enough money to handle the bills himself? People who can afford all kinds of insurance but choose to “go naked” are essentially thumbing their noses at their families and society.
— Kiplinger’s Personal Finance
More from Kiplinger
Go to
www.kiplinger.com for more .
KLMNO
G3
Drowning in information but starved for insight?
Introducing Capital Business, a new publication that takes a hard look at the local economy, covering insider news while it’s still fresh enough to be called news. A totally fresh, totally local, totally new business weekly delivered Mondays.
To subscribe go to
washingtonpost.com/capitalbusiness/subscribe or call 877-348-7678 Ext. 9
SUBSCRIBE NOW!
N257 6x10.5
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158