HEALTHY LIVING Do You Really Need That Test?
Pricey evaluations not only hurt the pocketbook, but also can cause undue physical and mental stress. ::
BY LYNN ALLISON O
ne of the great problems in Western medicine is the epidemic of over-testing.
While it is tempting to assume
that doing more tests results in better outcomes for patients, this isn’t always the case. Cancer screening tests, such as
the Pap smear for cervical cancer and colonoscopy or other tests to detect colon cancer, have a demonstrated benefi t, says Christopher Labos, M.D., a cardiologist with a degree in epidemiology at the McGill University Offi ce for Science and Society in Montreal. Also, checking people for high
blood pressure or high cholesterol after a certain age has value, because these health conditions produce no obvious symptoms and treatment prevents heart attacks. But many tests do not have much
merit when assessed subjectively and can trigger a cascade of more pricey
evaluations that not only hurt the pocketbook, but also can cause undue physical and mental stress. Choosing Wisely, an initiative
of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation, promotes conversations between clinicians and patients about what tests, procedures, and treatments are needed, and those that are not. For example, Choosing Wisely
does not recommend sending patients with low back pain for X-rays unless there is some reason to suspect a structural problem, says Labos. “Most low back pain is muscular,
while X-rays can only detect bony pathology,” he says. In addition, experts polled
by Choosing Wisely advise against routine chest X-rays and electrocardiograms to evaluate heart function in low-risk patients because they don’t add enough information and value in assessing health in most cases. Labos, co-host of a popular
For men ages 55-69, a PSA screening should be done with a clear understanding of risk versus benefi t. For men with symptoms, MRIs are of greater value to detect cancer.
podcast called The Body of Evidence, which wades through the existing evidence on health topics, says that routinely checking vitamin D levels is another interesting example of unnecessary testing. “Firstly, there is little
evidence that correcting low vitamin D levels prevents any signifi cant diseases like cancer or cardiovascular disease,” he tells Newsmax. “In fact, most of the trials
on this have been frankly negative, showing no benefi t whatsoever. The data for osteoporosis is more equivocal and less defi nitive.” Labos says that doctors often
prescribe this test annually, even if the previous test was normal. “If it was normal then, there’s
probably little value in checking it again. While the price of bloodwork may be minimal, it can add up to a staggering amount when you do it a million times over with no clear medical benefi t,” he says. In the United States, overly
aggressive testing and treatment is estimated to cause 30,000 deaths among Medicare recipients alone, while unnecessary interventions are estimated to account for 10%-30% of spending on healthcare. Diagnostic testing probably
accounts for 10% of all healthcare costs, which now exceed $2.7 trillion, and that percentage is increasing over time, with advanced diagnostic imaging leading the way and diagnostic laboratory testing a close second, says David E. Newman- Toker, M.D., professor of neurology, ophthalmology, and otolaryngology and director of the Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Some diagnostic tests are misused or overused, with waste from
88 NEWSMAX MAXLIFE | DECEMBER 2023
LSTOCKSTUDIO/SHUTTERSTOCK / AQUARIUS STUDIO/SHUTTERSTOCK
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108