search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEW RUMINANT META-ANALYSIS FROM ALLTECH ADDRESSES PROTEIN CHALLENGES, CARBON


FORFARMERS SUPPLIES ORGANIC


FEED NATIONALLY ForFarmers has accomplished UK national coverage for its range of organic VITAFOCUS layer feeds. Achieved by the successful implementation of the organic soya oil at ForFarmers mills; Selby, Penrith, and Portbury. Access to organic soya oil has enabled


the revolution of organic poultry diets at ForFarmers. The focus has been centred on strengthening the key areas of UK organic growth opportunity, alongside differentiating the ForFarmers organic offering with the procurement and installation of organic soya oil. The successful implementation of the oil has been achieved by the hard work of the team, delivered through a staged process starting at Penrith and now reaching all three mills. The rollout has been accomplished by installing a specialist holding tank at the mill sites specifically for the organic oil, along with a dedicated delivery system. The new range of organic diets includes


feed materials that support the bird’s functional methionine requirements and methionine regeneration; freeing up other sources of the amino acid for structural processes essential for increased productivity and egg size. Andrew Fothergill, National Poultry Advisor at ForFarmers, explained “In this diet, we can more easily meet energy requirements from oil supplementation and can fully exploit medium energy ingredients such as sunflower meal. This, as well as providing protein, is an excellent source of structural fibre. Which improves gizzard function and helps support intestinal health.” The use of oil further improves the quality, consistency, flow through feeding systems, and palatability of the diet. The diet has seen great success to


date, David Hilldrith, Poultry Sales Director at ForFarmers, explained: “Most of the organic egg producers we work with have switched already, or are in the process of switching, to our new range. They have quickly noticed improvements in shell quality, superior feather cover and they’re seeing fewer seconds. Customers are also reporting greater feed intake, which means more nutrients available for egg production.” Other positive feedback from customers to date includes comments on the feed form, how well it flows through feeding systems and overall less wastage. The ForFarmers team has years of


experience around developing, manufacturing and supplying feed to organic livestock producers and the team has recently been further strengthened with the recent addition of account manager James Girdler, who will predominantly focus on organic feeds.


FOOTPRINT AND PROFITABILITY The tightening of global protein supplies is creating uncertainty for producers and the feed industry alike as to where this year’s protein supply will come from. Add to that the ever-increasing pressure on producers to meet the growing global demand for milk and meat while also reducing their environmental impact and remaining financially viable. While striking a balance between these seemingly conflicting goals may seem impossible, Alltech has released data from a new meta-analysis for ruminants that they believe proves otherwise. The results showed that Optigen®


, a


non-protein nitrogen ingredient, can replace vegetable protein sources and enable dairy and beef producers to simultaneously improve animal performance, reduce their carbon footprint and increase profitability. The new data from the meta-analysis examining the effects of Optigen supplementation in dairy cows is based on the results of 17 studies carried out in six different countries, while the beef study was based on the results of 17 studies carried out in nine different countries. “The responsible sourcing of protein


for animal feeds is a crucial global issue in the livestock supply chain, and the use of plant protein sources in animal diets can be restricted based on availability, price volatility and associated environmental impact,” said Dr. Saheed Salami, research fellow at Alltech. “These meta-analysis studies have confirmed that Optigen is a viable substitute for plant protein sources in ruminant rations, resulting in improved feed efficiency, profitability and environmental sustainability for dairy and beef production.”


Dairy research key findings: • The use of Optigen in dairy diets resulted in a carbon savings of around 54 g of CO2-eq/kg milk. • When extrapolated to the annual milk output of the Dutch dairy sector, for example, this would be equivalent to a carbon emission reduction of 574,004 tonnes of CO2-eq. Such a carbon saving represents 10% of the entire reduction target for agriculture and land use sectors required by the Dutch government by 2030.


• Optigen partially replaced approximately 21% of soybean meal across all diets. • Dry matter intake (DMI), protein intake and nitrogen intake decreased through space “saving” in the diet • Milk yield increased, and feed efficiency was improved by 3% in Optigen diets. • Nitrogen utilization efficiency in dairy


cows increased by 4%, thanks to improved nitrogen capture in the rumen. This translates to a reduction of the manure nitrogen excretion by 12 to 13 g of nitrogen/cow/day. • This data suggests, for example, that the use of Optigen could reduce the annual manure nitrogen excretion from Germany’s dairy sector by an average of 17,028 tonnes of nitrogen based on the annual milk output.


• The environmental benefits Optigen brings are through the substitution of soybean and other high protein concentrates in combination with improved production efficiency.


Beef research key findings: • The meta-analysis highlighted how the partial replacement of vegetable protein with Optigen exhibited a consistent improvement in the liveweight gains and feed efficiency of beef cattle. • There was an 8% average increase in liveweight gain and an 8% improvement in feed efficiency with the inclusion of corn silage, enhancing the effects of Optigen. • A simulation analysis based on these benefits indicated that feeding Optigen to 1,000 head of cattle with the goal of each animal gaining 440 pounds would: • Reduce time to slaughter by nine days.


• Lower feed costs by $18,000. • Decrease the carbon footprint of the beef unit by 111.5 tonnes of CO2- eq, contributing to a nearly 2.2% reduction in the carbon footprint of beef production.


“Vegetable protein sources are volatile;


they fluctuate in price and their nutritional composition is incredibly variable, while Optigen is the opposite and provides consistency in the rumen-degradable protein supply that is critical for rumen function,” said Dr. Vaughn Holder, ruminant research group director at Alltech. “These new meta-analyses on both beef and dairy animals show the depth of our research in both areas, as well as the versatility of the product across dietary raw materials and global geographies.” As a concentrated nitrogen source,


Optigen takes up less space in the diet compared to other nitrogen sources, such as soybean meal and rapeseed meal, leaving room for more rumen-friendly materials, such as homegrown forages. This additional space can also aid in allowing more energy into the diet. In some cases, dietary crude protein levels can also be decreased, thereby increasing efficiency and reducing the risk of nutrient wastage. These studies reaffirm that feeding Optigen offers unique economic and environmental benefits to dairy and beef production and positively impacts our food supply chain.


PAGE 54 MARCH/APRIL 2021 FEED COMPOUNDER


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76