search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Low crude protein diets supplemented with amino acids:


an efficient tool to improve piglet health and welfare while optimizing performance


By Aude Simongiovanni, William Lambert and Herman Claassen, Ajinomoto Animal Nutrition Europe (AANE) Summary


In the current context of decreasing the use of antibiotics and zinc oxide, low crude protein (CP) diets supplemented with amino acids (AA), play a fundamental role in improving piglet health and welfare. Thanks to a new customized AA-based approach developed by Ajinomoto Animal Nutrition Europe (AANE), low CP diets can easily be implemented to tackle this challenge and reduce post-weaning diarrhea (PWD), while optimizing animal performance. Increasing importance is given to the health and welfare aspects


of livestock, with a high pressure from the market and customers for sustainable animal products both from a health and a welfare perspective. The regulatory and consumer pressures on products like antibiotics and ZnO force the industry to identify innovative strategies to overcome health challenges. Once management factors are thoroughly controlled, other elements are crucial to ensure a good animal health and welfare. Among them, protein and AA nutrition play a fundamental role.


Low CP diets to reduce post-weaning diarrhea in piglets


Post-weaning diarrhea is a common condition in piglet production. Many factors, like the young age at weaning and the sudden change of diet and housing, contribute to the increased stress level of piglets. As a result, PWD often occurs, causing morphological and functional alterations of the small intestine, and therefore reducing nutrient absorption. This problem does not only influence performance, but also piglet


health and welfare status. Through a meta-analytical approach based on the compilation of the results of 26 published articles including 34 trials, AANE quantified the effect of low CP diets on the incidence of


PAGE 38 MARCH/APRIL 2021 FEED COMPOUNDER


PWD in piglets (Luise et al., 2021). This nutritional strategy, when carefully applied, allows a significant reduction (P < 0.0001) of piglets faecal score by 3% for each point of CP reduction (Figure 1).


Mode of action of low CP diet on health and welfare


Gut health is central to maintain a good overall health status and optimal performance of livestock. Gut health relies on different pillars among which are microbiota balance (the intestinal bacterial population is abundant and diverse with a high contribution of beneficial bacteria at the expense of pathogenic ones) and immune fitness (the immune system is able to respond in a proportionate manner to a challenge). Lowering dietary CP level supports these two pillars by reducing


the excess of AA and undigested N reaching the hindgut. On one hand, less substrates are available for pathogenic bacteria to grow, thus reducing their proliferation. On the other hand, harmful compounds produced during fermentation of non-digested AA such as biogenic amines, ammonia and other molecules such as phenols or P-Cresol are reduced. Thanks to AANE meta-analytic approach, it was quantified


that each point of CP reduction decreases ammonia concentration in the piglet hindgut by 5% (P < 0.0001). In addition, a decrease in the expression of the inflammation markers TLR-4 in the gut was quantified at 11% for each point of CP reduction (P < 0.0001), that is synonymous of a smaller investment of energy and AA in maintaining a highly stimulated immune system. Some studies also reported beneficial effects of low CP diets marked by an increased abundance of tight junctions, proteins involved in sealing gut mucosa cells together and signs of better gut integrity and lesser bacterial translocation.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76