search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
footprint, considering the direct emissions from production, as well as the transportation of feed and indirect emissions that arise from the impact of that feed on the animal. However, the true impact depends on the species and the system of production.


The Feeds EA™ model provides an opportunity to optimise a ration by demonstrating how formulation changes could reduce the carbon footprint of the feed.


In my opinion … Richard Halleron


WHAT DOES FUTURE SUSTAINABILITY REALLY MEAN FOR FARMERS?


I’m tired of being told that farmers must accept that the only scenario coming down the track for them is one within which food prices keep getting ever lower.


In response to this, producers will be expected to “get their act together” in a two-fold manner: increase productivity; and improve efficiency levels. All of this is fine and dandy, up to a point.


But, with increasing bureaucratic, environmental and administrative challenges continuing to impact local agriculture, surely farmers must get paid a price that reflects all of the ensuing investment that will be required to ensure compliance, where these matters are concerned. The reality is that we don’t do cheap food in this part of the


world.


Further evidence of the increasing bureaucratic pressure on farmers is the recent confirmation of increasing numbers of cattle being discarded at meat plants because of issues relating to their identification. A recent survey confirmed that farmers get more vexed when it comes to securing compliance with animal identification and


traceability measures than would be the case with any other facet of their businesses.


It’s also worth pointing out that, had red meat prices kept track with inflation over recent years, the producer price for beef now would be in the region of €5.50/kg deadweight.


This figure knocks for six the notion that food is expensive. In reality, all the staple food items are cheaper now, in real terms, than they were a generation ago. It’s also worth remembering that the amount of aid available to agriculture, courtesy of the Basic Payment Scheme, is reducing every year. And who knows what’s coming down the track, both in an Irish and UK context, once Brexit is finally sorted out. All of this serves to highlight the need for our farming industry to get a strong and clear message across to consumers, highlighting the need for a proper and constructive debate on the way food is now produced. Farmers cannot be expected to work for nothing. There is a clear and strategic need for the maintenance of a strong indigenous farming industry in Ireland and the UK. However, this will not be secured on the back of a cheap food policy.


Production costs have doubled on many farms over the past five years. This development has not been reflected in retail outlets across the EU, which means that farmers are taking most of the pain. Retailers and consumers must, therefore, be reminded in the strongest possible terms that farmers can only take so much. Back when Phil Hogan was EU agriculture commissioner, commitments were made to the effect that farmers’ “exposed” position at the very beginning of the food chain would be fully recognised by Brussels. Unfortunately, this story seems to have run out of steam since the new Commission took office.


Advice | Design and Engineering | Process Optimisation Real Time Sensor Data


Feed Mill Engineering


van Mourik Group Boylestraat 34 6718 XM Ede


The Netherlands PAGE 30 MARCH/APRIL 2021 FEED COMPOUNDER +31 (0)318 64 11 44


www.vanmourik-group.com info@vanmourik-group.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76