Nutriad Great Britain and Ireland 2018 mycotoxin survey in wheat
The presence of mycotoxins in feed and foodstuffs is an important concern for human and animal health. Aspergillus, Fusarium and Claviceps species of fungi are ubiquitous in nature and under ideal conditions, often infect crops and forages in the field, during storage, shipment and processing. Mycotoxins can cause serious health problems in animals and their presence in agricultural commodities may result in serious economic losses. Mycotoxins are also suspected of causing a variety of human diseases, including some forms of cancer. It has been estimated that mycotoxin-contaminated grains cost grain handlers and the livestock industry several hundred million dollars annually (CAST, 2003). The 2018 Nutriad mycotoxin survey covered 50 wheat samples
from across Great Britain and Ireland. All samples were collected directly from farms or animal feed production sites almost immediately after the harvest when the probability that some storage mycotoxins such as ochratoxin A (OTA) will have developed was low. Sample providers were advised to follow the principles of good sampling (Richard, 2000). Analytical personnel and/or laboratory staff were not involved, and therefore, did not influence any part of this procedure. 350 analyses were conducted to test for the presence of the 7
mycotoxins most frequently found in agricultural commodities intended for animal production. The survey provided insight into the incidences of aflatoxin B1
(AfB1 toxin, HT-2 toxin, fumonisins (FB1
), zearalenone (ZEN), deoxynivalenol (DON), T-2 + FB2
) and OTA. All 7 mycotoxins were analysed by liquid chromatography tandem
mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS). For the purpose of data analysis, non- detection levels were based on the limits of quantification (LOQ) of the test method for each mycotoxin: AfB1 <1 μg/kg; ZEN <15 μg/kg; DON <50 μg/kg; FB1
<20 μg/kg; FB2 <20 μg/kg; OTA <1 μg/kg; T-2/HT-2 toxin <10
μg/kg. Typically, the levels of DON and ZEN in wheat tend to be lower in Northern England and Scotland, moderate in Western England, Wales and Ireland and highest in Southern and South-Eastern England.
Results The results show that 28% of wheat samples were contaminated with DON and none of the samples contained AfB1, toxin nor FB1
ZEN, T-2 toxin, HT-2- and FB2 . The average concentrations of all identified
mycotoxins were low while the highest concentration of DON found in 1 of the samples reached only 131 μg/kg. One sample was contaminated with OTA and its concentration was 76.7 μg/kg (Table 1).
By Radka Borutova; Business development manager at Nutriad International Comparing DON and ZEN contamination levels of wheat in 2014,
2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, it is clear that the contamination levels in 2018 are comparable with the levels in 2014 (Figure 1).
Figure 1 – Comparison of percentage of positive samples in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 (>LOQ)
Conclusion The Nutriad 2018 mycotoxin survey in Great Britain and Ireland concluded that the year’s harvest of wheat is of good quality in terms of mycotoxin contamination. The quality of wheat is similar to that of 2014 and significantly better than in 2016 and 2017. However, based on the results of this survey conducted immediately after the 2018 harvest, the 2018 wheat crop in Great Britain and Ireland should not automatically be considered safe for inclusion into finished feed rations for all animal species and a degree of vigilance is prudent. Vigilance is always advisable as cereals in animal feeds originate
from many sources. Some South European cereals harvested in 2018 have been shown to be contaminated with medium to high concentrations of aflatoxins. The last possible line of defence is the detoxification of mycotoxins in vivo. The addition of proven mycotoxin deactivators to animal feeds is a very common method to prevent mycotoxicosis and is an effective strategy to keep mycotoxin risk low under any and all conditions.
References CAST, 2003. Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal and Human Systems. Task Force Report No.139. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. Ames, IA. Richard, J., 2000. Sampling and sample preparation for mycotoxin analysis. Romer®
Labs Guide to Mycotoxins. 2. Romer® Stylemaster Drive, Union, MO, USA 63084-1156. Table 1 – Mycotoxin contamination of wheat in Great Britain and Ireland Parameter Number of tests % of positive samples
Average concentration of positive samples [μg/kg] Maximum concentration of positive samples [μg/kg]
Abbreviations: AfB1 =aflatoxin B1
AfB1 50
0 0 0
DON 50 28 69
131
ZEN 50 0 0 0
T-2/HT-2 toxin 50 0 0 0
OTA 50 2
76.7 76,7
FB1 50
0 0 0
; DON=deoxynivalenol; FB1=fumonisin B1; FB1=fumonisin B2, OTA=ochratoxin A; ZEN=zearalenone FEED COMPOUNDER JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2019 PAGE 41
FB2 50
0 0 0
Labs Inc., 1301
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
