search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Bacterial cell debris in the gut: A problem or a hidden potential?


By Pietro Celi (DVM, PhD), Senior Scientist at DSM Nutritional Products


Optimal gastrointestinal function is influenced by many factors, including gut microbiota and the way it interacts with the animal (host). In fact, the gastrointestinal microbiota has been proven to modulate the development of the gastrointestinal tract and improve its morphology, stimulating the development of the gastrointestinal immune system, promoting host nutrition and reducing gastrointestinal pathogens. Therefore, the gastrointestinal microbiota has a significant impact on animal health and welfare.


Figure 1. Peptidoglycan: a major cell wall component.


microbiota load occurs, the result is an increase in bacterial cell debris, hence more PGNs. In an in vitro study, it was observed that the ratio of intact bacteria to bacterial cell debris was approximately 3.5:1. The ratio decreased to 1.2:1 after 24 hours and dropped to 0.45:1 after 96 hours. This demonstrates that the spontaneous lysis of cultured bacteria occurs over time. In an in vivo study, the ratio of intact bacterial cells to cell debris differed significantly depending on the location in the gastrointestinal tract, suggesting that older bacteria populations are found in segments of the tract where the ratio of intact bacteria to bacterial debris is at its lowest. When bacteria and their cell debris (PGNs) accumulate on the


PGN PGN The gastrointestinal microbiota is composed of both Gram-positive


(G+) and Gram-negative (G-) bacteria. The bacterial cell wall of G+ bacteria in particular but also of G- bacteria is a significant source of peptidoglycans (PGNs). When fragments of these cell walls accumulate in the gastrointestinal tract and become “intestinal waste,” they can decrease gastrointestinal function. Nutrient digestion and absorption are particularly prone to the adverse impact of this cell debris (Figure 1).


Gastrointestinal Health Problems on the Increase Incidence of subclinical necrotic enteritis and nonspecific small intestinal overgrowth of certain intestinal bacteria (dysbacteriosis) have been on the rise since antibiotic growth promoters were banned in the European Union. These health problems typically occur in 20-30 day-old broilers and result in wet litter, nonspecific enteritis, poor weight gain and decreased nutrient digestibility and absorption.


Bacterial Overgrowth Impacts Nutrient Absorption An increase in bacterial burden leads to an increase in intestinal permeability (nutrients passing through the intestinal walls), bacterial translocation and absorption of endotoxins such as ammonia, D-lactate and bacterial PGNs. When bacteria overgrow in the intestine, bile acids are deconjugated by bacteria resulting in malabsorption of fat and fat- soluble vitamins. One product of deconjugation is lithocholic acid which is poorly absorbed and acts as a toxin on the intestinal mucosa. Naturally occurring bacterial cell death generates PGNs in the gastrointestinal tract. When an increase in the gastrointestinal


intestinal mucosa they can impair absorption by competing for nutrients and by causing enterocyte damage resulting in increased intestinal permeability. Anaerobic overgrowth is most common during intestinal bacteria overgrowth. Coliforms, staphylococci, enterococci (Clostridium and Bacteroides spp. predominating) are the main species of bacteria in the duodenal juice of animals affected by intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Anaerobic bacteria and the consequent accumulation of their PGN-rich cell debris have a much greater potential to damage the intestinal brush border and cause malabsorption. Moreover, anaerobes, especially Bacteroides, are the major cause of bile salt deconjugation which results in fat malabsorption. Various gut health conditions leading to malabsorption are often associated with secondary overgrowth of bacteria in the small intestine.


Imbalances Disrupt Gastrointestinal Function A normal function of the animal’s gastrointestinal tract depends on a normal composition of the gut microbiota. Therefore, any disturbance or alteration of this composition may lead to bacterial overgrowth. This, in turn, can lead to subsequent profound malabsorption in the proximal part of the gastrointestinal tract. In the intestinal lumen, bacterial cell wall fragments containing


PGNs can be released from commensal (non-pathogenic) bacteria. A variety of efficient mechanisms are devoted to their disposal to prevent them becoming harmful to the animal. Gastrointestinal function can be disrupted as a consequence of the imbalance between the production and disposal of cell debris. Therefore, a prolonged and increased exposure to PGNs in the gastrointestinal tract can hinder normal gastrointestinal function. Normal gastrointestinal motility involves a complex, tightly


coordinated series of events designed to move material through the gastrointestinal tract. Excess bacteria in the small intestine decreases gastrointestinal motility. Gut motility is crucial for the prevention of colonization of bacteria in the small intestine as it sweeps and moves bacteria and the associated cell debris into the large intestine. It has been suggested that PGNs are absorbed in the intestinal


mucosa. Therefore, timely disposal of PGNs and other cell debris may contribute to the maintenance of gastrointestinal function.


FEED COMPOUNDER JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2019 PAGE 23


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60