search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INDIAN GAMING Gateway to Gaming


The number one source for gaming news for India is Casino International’s excellent partner, Gateway to Gaming.


Supreme Court to review challenges against retroactive 28% GST on online gaming companies


The Supreme Court has taken notice of the petitions filed by Head Digital Works and Games 24/7, two prominent online gaming companies. These pleas challenge the government’s decision to retroactively impose a 28 percent Goods and Services Tax (GST) on the total value of bets placed, rather than on the gross gaming revenue. As reported by Money Control, the Court has


directed the Centre and the GST department to submit their responses within two weeks. Anticipated to be heard in a few months, the case has prompted the GST department to seek a transfer of all related cases from various high courts to the Supreme Court. Representing the online gaming companies, senior advocate Harish Salve appeared before the Court, countered by Additional Solicitor General Venkatraman representing the GST department and Union of India. In a prior instance on December 15, the Court


declined interim relief against the GST demand notices served to Head Digital Works and Games 24/7. The court however, indicated a willingness to review the constitutional validity of the government’s decision to retrospectively levy 28 percent GST on the full value of bets, effective from October 1. This legal battle stems from a disagreement


over GST rates for online gaming companies. While the firms argue that the 28 percent tax applies only from October 1, 2023, the government contends that the revision merely


clarified an existing law. Hence, the government declares that the tax demand isn’t backdated. In August 2023, the GST Council amended


the law, specifying that all online games involving bets, regardless of skill or chance, would attract a 28 percent GST rate based on the total value of bets placed, not on the gross gaming revenue. Consequently, online gaming firms received substantial tax demands, prompting concerns that this imposition could potentially ruin the entire industry. Show- cause notices alleging tax evasions amounting to Rs 1 lakh crore were served to these companies in 2023. September 2023 saw the apex court halting


the judgment of the Karnataka High Court, which had nullified a GST notice against Bengaluru-based online gaming company Gameskraft Technology, citing an alleged evasion of Rs 21,000 crore. Gameskraft Technology Private Limited


(GTPL) faced accusations of promoting online betting through various games like Rummy Culture, Gamezy, and Rummy Time without issuing invoices to customers, as alleged by officials. GST authorities imposed a 28 percent tax


on betting amounts of nearly Rs 77,000 crore, citing GTPL’s involvement in allowing players to place bets using money stakes on online card games.


Govt plans to file a plea seeking the transfer of all GST-related online gaming cases to the Supreme Court


The Union government has made a significant move in the ongoing dispute over the retrospective imposition of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on online gaming. On January 8, it pledged to file a petition requesting the transfer of all related cases from various high courts to the Supreme Court. During the court proceedings, Additional Solicitor


General Venkatraman, representing the Union government and the GST department, confirmed the filing of this plea. Renowned senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the online gaming firms, and Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud acknowledged that centralizing these cases in the apex court would ensure consistency. Chandrachud expressed his inclination to approve the transfer once the petition was officially submitted. Venkatraman emphasized the alignment of all


governmental arms in handling the online gaming cases, dismissing reported differences in opinions within the media. Simultaneously, the Supreme Court issued


notices in response to plea by online gaming companies such as Head Digital Works and Games 24/7. These companies challenged the government’s decision to retrospectively impose a 28 percent GST on the total value of bets placed, rather than on the gross gaming revenue. A prior report from November 2023 by


Moneycontrol had hinted at the government’s intention to consolidate all GST-related online gaming cases under a unified principle in the Supreme Court. According to a senior finance ministry official, the goal was to ensure a singular interpretation of the law, given the cases’ concentration on the taxability aspect. The controversy stemmed from the GST Council’s


approval of a 28 percent GST on all online games starting from October 1, 2023. Additionally, it declared that from 2017 until October 1, 2023, all online games involving bets, regardless of skill or chance, were liable to pay a 28 percent GST on the total bet value, citing it as gambling. Consequently, these gaming companies have collectively received GST notices totaling Rs 1 lakh crore this year.


24 FEBRUARY 2024


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76