search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
STATESIDE Stateside


Legal sports betting remains the elephant in the room, the hot potato, El Dorado – Sharon Harris looks at the last big gaming frontier in the US


As states scramble to introduce their own programs, the professional sporting leagues will certainly fight to enter the


financial mix. How this plays out is anyone’s guess.


D


ecember’s workplace holiday parties and closures typically shorten our attention spans…but not this year. The American gaming industry has focused on the December 4 Christie v. NCAA (National


Collegiate Athletic Association) U.S. Supreme Court arguments that may determine the future of legal American sports betting. The Court chose this landmark case, one of only 80-100 cases heard each session, from 7-8,000 submitted. Could 2018 be the year? Enough groups think so


as they prepare to dismantle the 1992 Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA). Many, like me, consider PASPA archaic and discriminatory against individual states. Since passing, times, technology and public attitudes have changed. American Gaming Association (AGA) Vice


President of Public Affairs Sara Slane claims 15 states have either introduced or enacted sports wagering legislation should the ban be overturned. New Jersey has done more. Outgoing New Jersey Governor Chris Christie states the Monmouth Park race track could offer all games within days of a decision, soon followed by the Meadowlands. Like New Jersey’s online gaming, the industry has developed partnerships and


8 DECEMBER 2017


technology. How long can New Jersey monopolize East Coast sports betting is anyone’s guess, but I suspect it would be a short run. For those new to the industry, PASPA authorized


Nevada, Delaware, Montana and Oregon to launch sports betting. Nevada did; the others didn’t. New Jersey had one year to pass its own legislation, but incompetent, short-sighted politics blew that chance. A thriving $150-$450 billion illegal market emerged, lacking consumer protections, community tax benefits and safeguards for sports integrity. The battle for change began years ago, when Christie determined to legalize both sports betting and Internet gaming. Voters agreed and while New Jersey’s subsequent online gaming program has succeeded, sports betting has continually confronted legal obstacles.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66