search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
“ After years of uncertainty, especially post-Brexit, the removal of steel and aluminium tariffs could breathe new life into the British metals industry. And for car manufacturers, the reduced tariffs, though capped, give a clearer path to the US market.”


GARIMA SRIVASTAVA, LEGISLATION SENIOR ADVISER, THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF EXPORT & INTERNATIONAL TRADE


HISTORIC BUT IMPERFECT: A COMPROMISE DEAL WITH THE US Sir Keir Starmer hailed the deal reached with the US in May as “historic” and he was right in as much as it was the first agreement reached with Washington since President Trump imposed tariffs across the world on the occasion he labelled – with unintended irony, according to many – Liberation Day. Unfortunately, by the beginning of June, the confusion


surrounding the White House’s clampdown had been thrown into further confusion after a US federal court ruled that Congress, not the president, had exclusive powers under the constitution to regulate commerce with other nations. The ruling affected only the blanket, global tariff of ten per cent, apparently leaving industry- specific tariffs in place. Only weeks before the ruling, the US-UK Economic


Prosperity Deal (EPD) had been hailed as an agreement that would save thousands of manufacturing jobs in the UK, even though it was far from a free trade deal. The British enthusiasm stemmed mainly from the fact that the Americans reduced the tariff on British-made cars from 27.5 per cent to ten per cent (subject to a maximum quota of 100,000 vehicles per year) and abolished the 25 per cent tariff on UK exports of steel and aluminium products, subject to a quota still to be determined. Adrian Mardell, CEO of Jaguar Land Rover – which,


in April, suspended all exports to the US when the car tariff leapt to 27.5 per cent – said the firm “warmly welcomed the deal, which secures greater certainty for our sector and the communities it supports”. An economic security alignment also means zero


tariffs on jet engines and aerospace components imported into the US, but other UK exports will still be subject to the universal ten per cent tariff imposed by the White House. The two governments have also agreed to negotiate a digital trade agreement but the concessions so far made


52


by the British to the US have caused concerns, not least the fact that US has trebled tariffs on the UK from the pre-Trump 3.4 per cent to ten per cent now, while the UK has cut its tariffs by two-thirds from 5.1 per cent to 1.8 per cent. Specific grievances centre on the zero duty rates that


will allow up to 13,000 tonnes of US beef into Britain a year (though UK rules banning hormone treated beef will remain, along with the outlawing of chlorinated chicken) and the abolition of the current 19 per cent tariff on ethanol. On beef, the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) applauded the protection of UK food standards in the deal, but condemned the level of access it granted US competitors. Tom Bradshaw, NFU president, said: “Our biggest concern is that two agricultural sectors have been singled out to shoulder the heavy burden of the removal of tariffs for other industries in the economy. “While we understand this, we also know that today


is the start, not the end, of a process and UK agriculture cannot continue to shoulder such imbalances in future negotiations.” On ethanol, a petrol substitute produced from


agricultural products, the leaders of the two companies that dominate the industry in Britain warned that they could collapse as a result of the deal. Paul Kenward, chief executive of ABF Sugar, and


Grant Pearson, chairman of Ensus, told The Times the deal posed “an existential threat” for the sector and put at risk hundreds of jobs at plants in NE England and Yorkshire. However, Garima Srivastava, legislation senior


adviser at the Chartered Institute of Export & International Trade said that, overall, the agreement represented “very welcome news” for UK exporters. “After years of uncertainty, especially post-Brexit, the removal of steel and aluminium tariffs could breathe new life into the British metals industry. And for car manufacturers, the reduced tariffs, though capped, give a clearer path to the US market,” she said. “Of course, the trade-offs on agricultural access and


digital taxes mean the UK is walking a fine line. But this deal signals a fresh momentum in transatlantic trade and businesses would do well to pay attention.” Ms Srivastava added that although “it is not a done


deal across the board, it is a strong signal that deeper cooperation could be coming”.


CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM IN THE GULF: GCC DEAL STILL IN LIMBO Although the UK government has branded a trade agreement with the six GCC nations (Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, and Bahrain) the “next deal” it will make, relatively little has emerged after three years of negotiations. These negotiations “have been going on for yonks so


we should be further on than we are now,” according to Edward Lister, co-chairman of the UK-UAE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116