Above left: Dr Stephen Uphill Above right: Tanasote treated utility poles in Finland
us to identify a highly effective combination of actives in the development of Tanasote S40, Arxada’s modern oil-based copper wood preservative alternative to Creosote. Tanasote S40 is the first wood preservative to make use of a new class of actives, SDHIs (Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors) and incorporates Arxada’s own DDACarbonate quaternary ammonium compound.
LABORATORY AND FIELD TESTS Once we have explored the performance of potential actives using metagenomic DNA Analysis, we then invest in testing to build the BPR efficacy package. To bring any wood preservative system to
market in Europe, they must be subjected to standard biological efficacy testing against decay fungi and wood destroying insects (outlined in EN 599-1). The table (Figure 2) shows the standard tests that were conducted in the development of Tanasote S40, which has received BPR authorisation across 23 countries including the UK and Ireland. For the development of new wood preservatives, Arxada chooses to go beyond the standard test framework summarised in Figure 1. We invest in tests beyond what is required to ensure our wood preservatives are designed with optimised retentions of highly effective active substances to deliver
long-service life. In the development of Tanasote S40, we engaged in additional laboratory fungal decay tests against non- standard, very aggressive rogue fungi, such as Fibroporia (Antrodia) vaillantii, which has been known to cause significant mass-loss to competing products. Tanasote S40 controlled Fibroporia (Antrodia) vaillantii at the lowest concentration tested, well below the commercial retention. Fungal cellar tests were also used to stress the Tanasote S40-treated timber in accelerated ground- contact scenarios.
In addition to the non-standard fungal decay tests, our test formulations are installed in aggressive high humidity locations in Europe, North America, and Asia to compare their performance in ground contact applications with well known (now withdrawn) industrial preservatives such as CCA and Creosote. To bring the above to life, I again refer to Tanasote S40. In accordance with AWPA E7-15 stake testing, in these high humidity locations, Tanasote S40 continues to perform as well as high levels of CCA (>12 kg/m3 required in BS5589 for 40-year service life of softwoods) and industrial levels of Creosote. The performance of the global stake tests are assessed annually and, to date, Tanasote S40 continues to perform as well or better than industry standards.
MOVING TOWARDS COMMERCIALISATION
Once the research and development team are confident in the actives and the biocide formulation, we then work closely with our colleagues in Regulatory to help build the BPR efficacy package for authorisation. Our other key stakeholders are the manufacturing, commercial and sustainability teams. We trial production on a small scale to ensure our micro-biological designs can be delivered in a way that work for the timber treaters (by bulk delivery or IBC). We also work with the commercial team and the wider sustainability team to look at Life Cycle Analysis and Environmental Product Declarations and prepare the necessary data for them to move these studies forward. The world of chemists in wood preservation is an exciting one, full of challenges as the regulatory world of actives available becomes smaller. But we relish this challenge and strive to solve wood preservation challenges by enhancing sustainability with cleaner, greener solutions. However, this does take time and the team at Arxada is already working on products that we will look to launch not only in the coming years, but through 2030 and beyond. ■
Figure 1: Summary of standard tests (outlined in EN 599-1) conducted in the development of Tanasote S40 Target organism
Scientific name Wood boring beetles Wood boring termites
Brown and white rot fungi (Basidiomycetes)
Soft rot rungi (Ascomycetes, Deuteromycetes)
Hylotrupes bajulus Reticulitermes santonensis
Coniophora puteana, Poria placenta, Gloeophyllum trabeaum, Coriolus versicolor
– Test method
EN47 (after EN73 evaporative aging and after EN84 leaching)
EN117 (after EN73 evaporative aging and after EN84 leaching)
EN113 (after EN73 evaporative aging and after EN84 leaching)
ENV 807 – exposure in unsterile soil in conditions promoting soft rot decay
External laboratory report date 2017/2018 2018 2018 2018
www.ttjonline.com | November/December 2024 | TTJ
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89
