search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
16 | Opinion


WOOD RECYCLING AT A CROSSROADS


With increasing incineration of wood waste for energy generation, and other prospective markets for the material on the horizon, it’s time to establish priorities on its best use, writes Wood Panel Industries Federation director-general Alastair Kerr


Contributing to the recent media debate around the growth of energy from waste plants and an associated rise in greenhouse gases, Lord Deben (John Gummer) ex environment minister and past chair of the Committee on Climate Change commented that the number of incinerators was beginning to “distort our ability to recycle”.


This touches on an issue pertinent to the wood panel industry. The UK manufacturers of chipboard recycle around 1Mt of reclaimed waste wood per year. A decade ago, half of this was coming from waste wood packaging. Today only a third comes from packaging and the overall quality has been dropping. It is the case that some of this ‘clean wood packaging’ is fi nding its way into animal bedding but we also know that material previously earmarked for recycling is instead being burnt for energy. The same is true for other waste wood arisings. Prior to the introduction of subsidies to support biomass energy development, the wood panel manufacturers were the largest consumers of waste wood. Today, whilst the sector remains the largest recycler of such material, this use is dwarfed by the volumes going to energy. In a market distorted by subsidy, it was inevitable that demand for waste wood to energy would increase and I’m not arguing to turn back time because climate change and energy security are imperatives I agree with. However, there is a policy confl ict between the Department for Energy (DESNZ) and the Department for the Environment (DEFRA) that needs to be squared and where the latter is seeking to promote circularity and adherence to the waste hierarchy. It’s all very well giving us different coloured bins and asking us to segregate plastics, paper and card etc but if it then all ends up in


an energy from waste plant (as it does in my county), then circularity and recycling opportunity ends at the doorstep.


In the real world ‘money talks’ and whilst the volume of UK waste wood arisings can sustain the current energy fl eet and material users such as the panel industry, it’s a balance that is close to a knife edge which could easily tip in favour of energy use were there to be either new subsidy support or an extension of existing (time limited) support for woody biomass to energy. The global wood basket is coming under ever increasing pressure from both power/heat production, but around the corner is the spectre of potentially huge demand from sustainable aviation fuels and bio chemicals. As well as prioritising afforestation and the planting of fast-growing species to help ‘grow the basket’, this is a time to really focus on maximising the use that we can get from this valuable resource. Let’s not forget, at the eventual end of life after reuse and recycling opportunities have been exercised, wood and wood-based products can still be burnt for energy recovery. ■


It’s all very well giving us different


coloured bins and asking us to segregate plastics, paper and card etc, but if it then all ends up in an energy from waste plant, then circularity and recycling opportunity ends at the doorstep


TTJ | November/December 2024 | www.ttjonline.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89