44 | Sector Focus: Panel Products
REGULATION DIVERGENCE
Is regulatory divergence between Great Britain and the EU a good or a bad thing, asks Ian Rochester, technical affairs manager of the UK-based Wood Panel Industries Federation
Brexit was sold on the possibility that it would free us from EU regulation and allow Great Britain to thrive. Whilst in theory Brexit gives GB the freedom to regulate in a better way, we are seeing that our close relationship with the EU still has a major influence on trade and therefore regulatory requirements placed upon British wood-based panel manufacturers. We cannot ignore this, but could we do
better?
The UK’s departure from the EU marked the beginning of its transition towards establishing its own regulatory frameworks. The UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement set the foundation for future relations but did not eliminate all barriers. Unfortunately, with a turbulent political backdrop there has been some stagnation with some GB regulations that affect our sector, whilst the EU has pushed forward with revising regulation, resulting in divergence which is about to hit.
The three main regulations that have been in focus for the wood-based panels sector are the Construction Products Regulation, REACH and the UK Timber Regulation (UKTR), which were all adopted into GB law following withdrawal from the EU. We have seen the previous UK government on at least two occasions indicate to the construction products industry that the acceptance of CE marking would end. Industry (manufacturers and Approved Bodies) prepared but deadlines came and passed, not without frustration or cost. The switch wasn’t as simple as first thought because testing in some sectors wasn’t possible either through capacity or ability to perform particular tests for some sectors.
Top: WPIF’s Ian Rochester Above: The CE mark logo
To date, no legislation has been passed to cease the acceptance of CE marking. [It is noted, however, that the current government has set out how any cessation should occur, including transition periods, which allows businesses to plan].
Indeed, there are some calls from the construction products sector to permanently accept CE marking. This in itself can cause issues especially for UK Approved Bodies that cannot work in Europe as Notified
Bodies. This could be solved through mutual recognition between the EU and GB but there must be political will to do this from both. Regulatory divergence can lead to increased costs for businesses operating in both markets. Whilst in theory Brexit gives GB some flexibility to regulate better or deliver in a more pragmatic way, it can also expose GB manufacturers to unfair competition from manufacturers looking to GB as an easy regulatory route, whilst GB manufacturers are still burdened by EU law. Take for example the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) and compare it with the UKTR. The UKTR will have a lower regulatory threshold than the EUDR.
This, coupled with GB manufacturers having to comply (by default) to the EUDR requirements, could make GB manufacturing businesses less competitive. If we are to meet the goals of building with more timber sourced from British forests (ie, the Timber in Construction Roadmap), we not only need to plant more productive trees, we also need to support businesses to invest and build more capacity to the benefit of GB. I recognise that we cannot do without imports, but we should ensure the regulatory framework in place doesn’t adversely affect businesses located here. So, is divergence a good or a bad thing?
Maybe this is the wrong question. Perhaps we should be asking ourselves whether GB can deal with divergence in a pragmatic way? In a way that benefits or at least doesn’t put British businesses at a disadvantage on the global markets and creates a level playing field for all businesses to compete in a fair framework, whilst allowing regulation to function properly and achieve its goals. ■
ABOUT THE WPIF
The Wood Panel Industries Federation (WPIF) is a representative organisation giving voice to the industrial manufacturers in the United Kingdom and Ireland of wood chipboard, oriented strand board (OSB) and medium density fibreboard (MDF). With a particular focus on technical and environmental influences, the role of the federation is to support its members’ processing activities and their products in the market. ■
TTJ | November/December 2024 |
www.ttjonline.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89
