search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sérgio R. Leite, Ludimila L. Silva & Luiz R. Gomes


dam operators in order to ensure more effective supervision. Partnerships with technology companies and research institutions should be encouraged.


8.5. Continuous training and interinstitutional cooperation Inter-institutional cooperation between ANEEL and other regulatory bodies can result in a more integrated and effective approach to inspection and regulation. The same can be said for the need to integrate databases from federal and state institutions. The exchange of experiences and resources through regular training and workshops improves actions to prevent, repair and respond to security events.


8.6. Community participation The communities affected by emergency plans and risk management must be involved in order to ensure that they are aware of the procedures and prepared for possible emergency situations. According to Villagrán de León[27]


, warning systems must be planned, implemented and operated with the aim of


empowering the people who need them most. Empowerment refers to adequate information about the risks they face and ways to minimize losses in the event of a catastrophic event. People-centered (bottom-to-top) warning systems, in contrast to technically oriented (top-to-bottom) systems, take as their starting point the communities that could be affected and plan the response system according to the characteristics of those communities. In technically oriented systems, the people at risk are incorporated at the end. For the author, the failures of communication in disasters are in contrast to the current trend of risk warning and communication systems.


8.7. Risk communication to society (fake news) The occurrence of negative events can make public perceptions more important than reality itself. In the last decade, major dam accidents in Brazil due to safety failures have projected a negative image of these structures, contributing to them not being perceived by the majority of public opinion, as a rule, as controlled and safe assets. These effects have been amplified by the massive dissemination of information. When society is unable to distinguish between true and false information, its trust in institutions and their ability to provide accurate and reliable information is shaken. The risks in a tragedy are great and disinformation amplifies them. Fake news diverts attention to non-existent problems. As one of the regulators of the dam safety process, it is up to ANEEL to expand its activities in promoting practices to combat erroneous assumptions by making data and reports on dam safety available to the public in an objective and accessible way.


8.8. Attention to small dams and their dissemination Small dams on watercourses, although they have important and diverse purposes, are not taken into account by the regulatory guidelines established in Brazil, where the regulatory system has been stimulated by discussions analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of large dams only for large enterprises. It must be acknowledged that small dam failures also have disastrous consequences. In China, in 1975, the collapse of the Shimantan and Banquia dams resulted in the cumulative collapse of more than 60 small dams downstream, resulting in the deaths of 230,000 people. According to Viseu[28]


, the ruptures of large 176 | Dam Engineering | Vol XXXIII Issue 3


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100