Wellerson Bastos, Marcos Pimenta Filho, Luiza Almeida, Marina Ferreira & Mauro Santos Junior
monitoring, visual inspections, and electromechanical equipment testing. Instrumentation-based monitoring relies on devices such as vibrating wire piezometers (VW piezometers) to measure critical parameters, including pore pressures, displacements, and water levels. Visual inspections detect physical anomalies that are observable by sight, while electromechanical tests ensure the proper function of critical components, such as reservoir gates and valves. Effective monitoring requires an understanding of the primary failure modes to which dams are susceptible, as outlined by [2]
and [3] . These modes include overtopping (caused by excessive reservoir
levels), internal erosion (loss of material due to seepage), liquefaction (loss of soil strength due to increased pore pressures), and slope instability (sliding of soil masses driven by elevated pore pressures). Piezometric monitoring is directly associated with slope instability, where measurements indicate increased interstitial pressures that could compromise slope stability. It is also indirectly linked to liquefaction detection and the identification of hydraulic gradients that signal internal erosion. VW piezometers are recognized for their robustness, precision, and long-term durability, making them indispensable in dam monitoring, particularly in conditions where manual readings are impractical or where structures experience high dynamic loads. Their ability to transmit data over long cables without significant signal degradation further enhances their utility in remote or large-scale installations. However, the accuracy and reliability of VW piezometer readings depend on adherence to best practices during installation, operation, and maintenance, as recommended by manufacturers such as Geokon[4]
, Encardio Rite[5] , RST Instruments[6] , Geosense[7] , Soil Instruments[8] . The “fully grouted” installation method, highlighted by[9], has gained prominence for enabling the placement of multiple
sensors along a single borehole, thereby enhancing spatial data resolution, particularly in low- permeability soils. Beyond installation, several technical procedures are critical for obtaining accurate measurements.
These include verifying sensor condition, ensuring proper saturation of the porous stone, inspecting electrical parameters, and correctly applying frequency-to-pressure conversion formulas. Initial zero readings, taken after the sensor reaches thermal equilibrium, provide a baseline for subsequent data and must be recorded before the final installation at the monitoring point. Additionally, correcting for environmental variables, such as temperature and barometric pressure changes, is essential to avoid misinterpretation of data due to frequency deviations[10]
. Given the complexities involved in both operating and interpreting VW piezometer data, this article
aims to systematize the key technical aspects and highlight best practices. The structure follows a logical and didactic progression: it begins with the physical principles underlying VW piezometer operation, a description of essential components, and their influence on performance. It then addresses sensor preparation steps, such as porous stone saturation and initial zero readings, before discussing manufacturer-specific correction equations and their adaptation in automated and manual data acquisition systems. Lastly, diagnostic tools for identifying errors and optimizing monitoring system performance are presented. By integrating these considerations, the article seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the operational nuances of VW piezometers, aiming to mitigate common errors and enhance the reliability of geotechnical monitoring programs for dam safety.
106 | Dam Engineering | Vol XXXIII Issue 3
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100