Wellerson Bastos, Marcos Pimenta Filho, Luiza Almeida, Marina Ferreira & Mauro Santos Junior
inspection should also confirm that thermal and barometric correction coefficients are up to date in the datalogger or readout to avoid systematic errors. Finally, the correct application of correction factors and the validation of conversion equations ensure that vibrating wire piezometers provide precise and representative measurements. Adopting best practices and advanced signal analysis technologies reinforces the reliability of the monitoring system, enabling safe and effective tracking of geotechnical structures.
4. Verification Resources and Parameters
4.1. Available reading and diagnostic technologies The accuracy of measurements obtained from vibrating wire piezometers directly depends on the reading technologies and diagnostic resources of field devices. These devices convert the resonant frequency of the vibrating wire into engineering units, such as pressure or displacement, and are essential for identifying anomalies that could compromise data reliability. With technological advancements, modern devices offer tools not only for reading but also for detailed signal quality analysis, ensuring reliable measurements in geotechnical monitoring campaigns. One of the key monitored parameters is the analysis of the vibrating wire’s frequency. The traditional
approach consists of time-domain analysis, where the frequency is calculated based on zero-crossings within a given time interval. Devices such as the VW2106 and the GK-404 use this method, which, despite its efficiency, is susceptible to low and medium-frequency noise from external sources, such as power grids and engines. To mitigate these effects, more advanced equipment, such as the GK-406 and VWAnalyzer, uses VSPECT™
technology, which applies Fourier transforms to convert the signal into a frequency spectrum, enabling precise identification of the dominant frequency even in environments with high electromagnetic interference. In Figure 6, two examples of signals in the time domain and frequency spectrum are presented, illustrating the differences between a clean signal and one with interference:
Figure 6. Graphical representation of signals in vibrating wire piezometers (Source:[20]
Figure 6 highlights that, in an ideal signal, the frequency spectrum presents a clear and isolated peak (an indicator of an accurate reading), while a signal with interference shows multiple peaks (markers 25 to 27),
116 | Dam Engineering | Vol XXXIII Issue 3
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100