search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The challenges of the Brazilian electric energy regulatory agency on mitigate effects from 2024 Rio Grande do Sul floods


The high volume of rainfall caused various impacts, such as: loss of access, collapse of slopes and hillsides, damage to road structures and erosion. Power and communication supplies were also interrupted. By design, the 14 de Julho dam was dimensioned to withstand a flood that represents El. 111.50m in the


upstream reservoir, and the downstream level at El. 110.52m. Thus, in the limit load situation, the expected upstream/downstream gradient is less than 1.0m. On 02/05/2024 at 13:23h, with the reservoir level at 111.61m, there was a partial breach of the structure of the 14 de Julho Hydroelectric Power Plant from the right shoulder, the controlled spillway gates were partially open and unable to continue the opening process. Due to the loss of measurement of the level downstream of the dam, it was estimated from a photo taken on 01/05/24, with the downstream level approximately at the trunnion beam, which represents El. 98.00m. In this condition, there is an upstream/downstream gradient of approximately 13.6m. This gradient is a consequence of the impossibility of opening the gates fully and represents a load above the limit for which the structure was designed. Figure 12 shows the damage caused to the dam structure after collapse.


Figure 12. 14 de Julho dam after partial collapse[CERAN, 2024] The EAPs have been operational since 30/04/2024. When the EAP was activated during the event,


there were no difficulties in liaising with the regional and municipal Civil Defenses and other parties involved.


On spillway region, the post-event inspections results identified some adhesion loss between the roller- compacted concrete (RCC) and conventional concrete (SCC) layers, which could indicate that no bonding mortar was used between the RCC layers. Between the construction joints of the face layers of SCC, it was also not possible to identify the treatments between layers. In view of the observations regarding concrete technology, it was recommended that an investigation


plan be carried out, using boreholes, water loss tests, borescopy, ultrasound and laboratory tests, in order to support the preparation of the executive project and any treatments. Nevertheless, post-event inspections showed that the remaining structures are stable for the plant’s operating flows. Although there is no structural risk, the plant has been maintained at a Safety Level of ‘Alert’ until the dam restoration is completed, in accordance with REN 1.064/2023.


5.2. Salto Forqueta small hydroelectric power plant The dam, located on the Forqueta River in the municipalities of Putinga and São José do Herval, partially broke due to structural damage on its right bank caused by landslides. In addition to the emptying of its reservoir, there was flooding in its Powerhouse.


Vol XXXIII Issue 3 | Dam Engineering | 169


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100