search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
UNITE VIEWPOINT HICKERY DICKERY DOCK


Firstly and before we get into the main thrust of this month’s article, I thought I’d take time to applaud the Government’s recent exten- sion of their ‘Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme’ for


employees, until the end of October; announced by the Chancellor on 12 May 2020.


Whilst applauding this common sense approach towards the employees, I have to seriously question, with some suspicion I might add, why the Government didn’t extend the ‘Self-Employment Income Sup- port Scheme’ in the same terms and at the same time? Why does there continuously seem to be such a glaring disparity in the treatment of the self-employed by the Government vis-à-vis their employee counterparts? Why are the self-employed treated like lepers by the current Govern- ment?


Many trade members have had to endure in excess of two months of no work and no income. Some trade members have found themselves entitled to nothing – through no fault of their own!


This brings me onto this month’s article; during the current emergency and in the absence of driving a cab, I have been more than occupied with assisting our members with all sorts of ‘Coronavirus’ connected issues. Yet, I have also through the pro- found difference in my usual routine, found myself with a lot of time to think and to contemplate life’s mysteries!


‘reasonable and necessary’ – whilst also remaining proportionate. Candidates must also be asked if they can present the local trade as a bunch of untrustworthy rogues to be harshly regulated for everyone’s pro- tection, regardless of the fact that many of them possess far more experience and expertise than the officers.


Finally, the mindless and dogged perse- verance and observance of fallacious policy in the face of overwhelming evi- dence to the contrary – would seem to be ‘must haves’ in terms of a ‘good fit’ for offi- cer employment.


Given the outrageous conduct and behaviour of many local authorities in their response to this global pandemic, the same question seems to recur in my mind: “What makes a local authority licensing officer tick?”


It’s certainly a conundrum worthy perhaps of someone’s ‘chosen specialist subject’ on Mastermind.


Let’s start at the beginning, what is the interview process like? What’s the REAL job description and what ‘specialist’ quali- ties do authorities look for in potential applicants? The evidence drawn from successful can- didates who have gone on to to be fully fledged officers seems to point to a possi- ble ‘laundry list’ of potential attributes, including; a complete lack of empathy, a lack of consideration for others, the inabil- ity to rationally, pragmatically and properly think through strategies to be


I have come to believe that the first ques- tion at interview must be, “Do you have any experience in the transport industry and do you know the difference between a taxi and a private hire vehicle? No? Excel- lent, you’ve passed part one of the interview!


Are applicants, as I believe, treated during the interview process to a ‘role play’ involving such dilemmas as: “Tell us about a time when you’ve successfully dreamt up some mindless overregulation purely based upon your own personal whim and caprice without any local evidential basis; and then gone onto defend your policy against legitimate challenge that is under- pinned by overwhelming evidence?” Perhaps moving onto: “Can you remember a time where you’ve meddled with some- thing that you did not understand and what’s more had no experience or exper- tise in, only to break it and then gone on to blame everyone else?”


50


JUNE 2020


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112