search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Meat damaged due to wrong temperature settings


The container vessel had loaded cargo in a South American port to be discharged in Europe. Several reefer containers with meat were also loaded. The containers had been filled with superior chilled meat at a cargo temperature of around 0°C. The containers were set to chilling mode with a set point temperature of -1.4°C.


For some reason one of the containers was switched to freezing mode with a set point of -18°C and remained at this setting throughout the entire month’s voyage to Europe. On the bill of lading, it was stipulated that the container should be kept chilled at a temperature of -1.4°C. However, during the loading operation the agent supplied an initial reefer list which had two separate entries for this container - one stated that the container should be chilled and another stated that it should be frozen.


This mistake was discovered by the crew, and the agent then updated the reefer list confirming the set point temperature as -1.4°C for the container. One month later the vessel discharged the containers in Europe.


When the cargo receiver inspected the meat, it found it to be frozen. The meat should have been chilled as it becomes damaged when it is frozen.


According to the container unit’s records the temperature in the container fell a couple of days after departure. This caused the meat to freeze. Over a sufficiently long time, even a reefer container will achieve solid freezing of the entire cargo. In this case, there was clearly sufficient time.


Each piece of meat was packed in a heat-sealed vacuum plastic liner bag. When the cargo receiver inspected the meat, it had turned dark red and slightly brownish and the vacuum bags contained a considerable quantity of blood. The meat which was initially of superior quality could now only be used for lower-end products and had to be sold for a loss.


Damage to seafood


A shipment of containerised boxed shrimps shipped from Argentina to China was found to be badly frosted. The shrimps inside the boxes were also beginning to blacken due to melanosis. Shrimps and crustacea undergo melanosis (an enzyme


catalysed oxidation) when they are kept at incorrect temperatures and/ or past their shelf life. Melanosis is also related to the freshness of the product at the time of freezing and whether it has been treated with any preservatives. While melanosis is not dangerous for consumption, it is a quality control indicator, and renders the shrimps unsightly and unsaleable.


The frosting is a second indicator that the product had suffered temperature abuse. Frosting appears when a product is thawed and then partially refrozen. Usually, the boxes are tightly packed into the containers, restricting airflow through the cargo and effectively insulating the cartons inside the stow compared to the ones in the outside. The product on the inside of the stow would be insulated against the worst damage by the cargo around it. It is then expected to observe a gradient of damage as the condition of the cartons is poorest nearest the door and the external edges of the stow, with the damage lessening towards the rear of the container.


The cargo should always be kept below the load line of the container, away from the container walls and not beyond the ‘T’ bars to allow the refrigerated air to flow freely around


90 | ISSUE 106 | DEC 2023 | THE REPORT


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144