search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Membership


Retaining members for any membership organisation is challenging these days and we live in difficult times. But I am pleased to report that IIMS membership has remained stable this year. Some months we tip just over the 1,000 mark, some months just below. We have had the usual churn of membership across the year of about 4%, which is quite normal. A few members have passed away and some have left the industry, but most noticeable this past year is the number of retirees, much higher than in previous years.


New membership applications seem to come in waves. Some months we get one or two, other months many more. But across the year we receive about 130 new applications. Each and every one is reviewed by a member of the Professional Assessment Committee (PAC). They are responsible for ensuring that only those who are suitable to become members are granted membership. We have rejected some applications this year for the simple reason that there is no supporting objective evidence. Most applicants apply for far too many specializations and when asked for some evidence and proof of their competency and experience, they cannot provide anything substantial enough to satisfy the PAC. Capt Chris Kelly and his committee colleagues are to be congratulated for their commitment and valuable work in this area.


Certifying Authority


Under the guidance of David Parsons, supported by Rosie Webb, the IIMS Certifying Authority (CA) has had a remarkably successful year with a significant uplift in income too. To remind you, IIMS is contracted by the UK Maritime & Coastguard Agency (MCA) to code commercial boats up to 24 metres. Our fleet size has grown, albeit slowly. But tonnages have grown exponentially, in fact more than doubled. We have authorized several members as tonnage measurers over the year. But it seems there have been other external factors at work in our favour.


Our annual CA external audit was undertaken by the MCA in October. It is fair to say we look forward to this event each year with a bit of trepidation. But the audit was clean with a few findings, but nothing of significance to report. I extend my personal thanks to IIMS CA Chairman, Fraser Noble, who backed by a strong and engaged committee, has done a first-class job.


The MCA is engaged is bringing two new sets of regulations to the sector. The Workboat Code 3 has had a difficult passage towards the statue book and the outcome of the consultation angered a number of surveyors and vessel operators. Those individuals and organisations voiced their opinions loudly across


the year. At the time of writing, the full extent of the new code is not clear, but in the coming weeks the content will be revealed and then we need to train some of our code examiners accordingly who specialize in workboats with details of the new regulations.


In conjunction with this work, the MCA has also been active in bringing the various codes applicable for Sport and Pleasure vessels into one code. IIMS has had a seat at the table as the new code has been formulated. I expect this work to go into formal consultation early in 2024 before formal implementation later in the year.


Professional Qualifications


The Institute has had a progressive year with its two professional qualifications, one in Yacht and Small Craft Marine Surveying, the other in Commercial Ship Surveying. Vicki Loizides continues to run the distance learning programme efficiently helped by the new automated student portal we introduced last year. This year nearly 100 new students have enrolled. Vicki has continued the ongoing process of assessing and reviewing the various modules to ensure they are still fit for purpose in an ever changing technological landscape.


THE REPORT | DEC 2023 | ISSUE 106 | 35


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144