search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
What changes are proposed to the Directive on ship- source pollution and why?


The revision of Directive 2005/35/ EC will significantly extend the scope to: harmful substances carried by sea in packaged form, sewage, garbage, and discharge water and residues from scrubbers. The proposal clarifies the liability regime applicable under MARPOL and introduces new measures on administrative penalties, without affecting the Environmental Crime Directive[1], currently under inter- institutional negotiations, which will take over the criminal penalties for ship-source pollution offences. In light of the cross-border nature of ship-source pollution, criteria to set penalty levels will also be introduced, ensuring that their deterrent effect is consistent across the EU.


The revision proposes to extend the surveillance services provided by EMSA through ‘CleanSeaNet’ to cover all types of pollutants. To improve information exchange between Member States and the Commission and strengthen enforcement action against pollution, EMSA tools and services such as CleanSeaNet, SafeSeaNet and THETIS will be further optimised and follow-up obligations on potential pollution incidents are provided for. These measures should allow Member States to better target potential pollution and reduce their enforcement costs.


The Commission will assist Member States in implementing the revised directive by assisting the training of relevant national authorities and facilitating whistle-blowers reporting potential pollution incidents. To increase public awareness on ship- source pollution discharges, and improve environmental protection, a regularly updated website containing key non-confidential information will inform the public of the implementation of the Directive.


The proposal also revises the reporting obligations of Member States to allow better monitoring of the implementation of the


enforcement system provided by the Directive. To minimise the administrative burden, the development of a single reporting tool for Member State is proposed (to be developed by EMSA).


What changes to the Regulation establishing EMSA are proposed and why?


The revision is a necessary step to make the agency more effective and responsive. The agency’s mandate needs to be revised as it does not properly reflect EMSA’s current scope of activities. This has changed due to the evolving needs of the maritime sector and the new EU regulatory framework in several areas.


The proposed Regulation will reflect EMSA’s new tasks in maritime safety, sustainability, decarbonisation, security and cybersecurity, surveillance, and assistance in crisis management.


EMSA also carries out visits to Member States to verify operations on the ground on behalf of the Commission as part of EMSA’s support role to the Commission. In port State control, flag State compliance and accident investigation, Member States will have to put in place a quality management system. This will have to be certified and subsequently subject to audit every five years.


The more detailed reporting requirements of Member States under the revised ship-source pollution directive will ensure that the Commission collects the necessary information for monitoring the implementation of the Directive, in the interest of minimising pollution from ships in European seas. Implementation can for example be monitored by checking if Member States provide feedback to EMSA- managed CleanSeaNet alerts in a timely and effective manner. The Commission, with support from EMSA, will also develop a public website with core indicators on the implementation rate, and the key non-confidential information on incidents of illegal discharges.


How will the Commission support the implementation of the proposed


directives? The Commission services will monitor the implementation and effectiveness of these initiatives through a number of actions.


The port State control Directive, as well as the maritime accident investigation Directive, already require administrations to upload results to the THETIS database, managed by EMSA. The flag State Directive will provide for Member State authorities to also share the result of their flag State inspections.


What else is the Commission doing to make maritime shipping cleaner and safer?


On safety matters, the EU has a comprehensive set of legislation which is constantly reviewed. The Commission, supported by EMSA, is engaging with experts from Member States, as well as from other stakeholders, to address current issues, such as containership safety, autonomous shipping, and ships in need of technical assistance, to ensure continuous improvement and enforcement at national, EU and international level.


The Commission works continuously with EU Member States and third country partners in the IMO to help the organisation deliver on higher safety and environmental standards.


THE REPORT | DEC 2023 | ISSUE 106 | 85


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144