64 Advertising feature
LEGAL CORNER W
hen the chips are down and divorce is the only card left to play, tax planning is unlikely to be top of the list for many
couples. But failing to transfer assets at the right time may result in unexpected charges for capital gains tax, eating into much-needed capital. When a couple first separate, transfers and disposals made during the current tax year can be on a ‘no gain, no loss’ basis. But matters become complex and could involve tax charges on the spouse or civil partner who is transferring the asset, once outside that first tax year. And the likelihood of this is rising with financial matters becoming increasingly complex, and many divorces taking longer to complete. Recognising that couples going through the
trauma of separation do not consider the tax implications and timing of asset transfers, the Office of Tax Simplification has recommended that the tax rules be updated to reflect a fairer and more modern approach to separation and divorce. In response, the Government
Taking positive action in tricky times
By family law expert Rebecca Procter
lawyers we will be keeping a close eye on the progress of these proposed reforms, as it may be a good idea to intentionally delay some asset transfers until the proposed new rules take effect.” Provisions within the Taxation of Chargeable Gains
Being hit with unwelcome, and
possibly unexpected, tax bills can turn a difficult situation into a full- blown crisis.
is proposing to introduce legislation to change the rules for disposals that take place on or after 6 April 2023. The proposed changes would extend the window of ‘no gain, no loss’ transfers and disposals to three tax years after the end of the tax year of separation, or where there is a formal court order with no time limit. Family lawyer, Rebecca Procter here at Wollens
said, “Even with the best intentions and swift agreement between a couple, it can be a real challenge to conclude financial matters before an April deadline, particularly for those who separate later in the year. Being hit with unwelcome and possibly unexpected, tax bills can turn a difficult situation into a full-blown crisis, when tax may need to be paid but no cash has been realised to do so. “Good planning can help avoid such problems, but this proposal would provide much needed flexibility. It won’t remove the need for specialist legal and tax advice, and timing will remain important, but it would be a very positive change.” Rebecca added: “In the meantime, as family
Act 1992 cover the tax position when spouses live together, and when they dispose of assets on divorce. And while these provide for some relief from capital gains tax, including on the primary marital home, the circumstances are limited and can be inflexible in the reality of current-day divorce. One example is in the different
approaches to dealing with jointly- owned property. With house prices continuing to rise, more couples are agreeing to retain the family home until children are adult, whether ‘bird
nesting’ – where shared childcare sees parents move between homes, rather than the children – or where a couple agree they will delay selling up and dividing the proceeds until the children leave home. The proposals would help in this situation,
provided the arrangements are in accordance with a court-approved agreement as an ex-spouse or civil partner would be entitled to receive the same tax treatment on any proceeds in the future, as they would have received if the property had been sold or transferred at the time of the separation. Seeking out the right help and support can make all the difference for couples, so they come through the divorce with a sense of a positive resolution, where everyone has an outcome that works for them and feels fair. If you or someone you know needs support please contact us at an early stage. You can contact Rebecca Procter on 01803 225158 or email
rebecca.procter@
wollens.co.uk
www.wollens.co.uk 01803 213251 67 THE TERRACE, TORQUAY, DEVON TQ1 1DP EMAIL: INFO
WOLLENS.CO.UK
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108
