search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ESTATE MAINTENANCE


steeped in the culture of evidence-based medicine. Departments that are able to argue a clear case for the cause and effect of action or inaction on patients stand a significantly greater chance of attracting capital funding than those who provide circumstantial evidence at best. However, there are clear actions that can be taken by Estates professionals to start to respond to this question.


Reporting The current NPSA reporting tool captures some data on the impact of estate-related patient harm. This is predominantly direct impact, not the true effect of estate on patient outcomes. However, it is possible to quantify the time, cost, and effort taken to rectify incidents when they occur. This information will start to give the profession evidence on the impact of underinvestment on the Trust’s infrastructure, and will also start to provide greater anecdotal evidence on the magnitude of the disruption caused to the patient pathway.


Research In 2020/21 The National Institute of Healthcare Research (NIHR) granted £1.2 bn in funding for research in the NHS, none of which was directed at estates infrastructure research; nor has there been any over the last five years.15


This is


despite there being significant evidence through the work on evidence-based design that the environment in which we deliver healthcare has a strong effect on the outcome of patients. This research needs to be expanded into the live hospital setting, so as to greater understand the impact and importance of the role that ‘Estates’ plays in the delivery of high- quality healthcare provision. The work that the NHS estates


professionals do is foundational to providing high quality infrastructure for the delivery of safe clinical services. However, this is proving harder to deliver year on year, with costs spiralling, and capital becoming ever restricted. The response by the profession must one of clear irrefutable evidence.


References 1 Davies N, Atkins G, Guerin B, Sodhi S. How fit were public services for coronavirus? CIPFA / Institute for Government. August 2020.


2 NHS England / NRLS Reports. Organisation patient safety incident reports. 23 and 29 September 2021. https://tinyurl.com/muutbf9z


3 NHS Digital. Estates Returns Information Collection Summary page and dataset for ERIC 2019/20. NHS Digital. 2021. https:// tinyurl.com/45zcdcs9


4 NHS Estates. A risk-based methodology for establishing and managing backlog. London: The Stationery Office; 2004.


54 Health Estate Journal September 2022


Protocols/Policy/Procedure/ Guideline Availability/Adequacy, 68%


Screening/Prevention/ Routine Check-up, 12%


Diagnosis/ Assessment, 21%


Organisational Teams/People, 9%


Human Resource/Staff Availability, 22%


Bed/Service Availability/ Adequacy, 1%


Matching of workload management, 1%


Behaviour, 1%


Bloods/blood products, 0% Nutrition, 1%


Oxygen/ gas vapour, 0%


Healthcare-associated infection, 1%


Non-classified, 28% Patient accident, 1%


Monitoring, 5%


Supply/Ordering, 5% Storage, 1%


Administration, 16%


Presentation/Packaging, 2% Delivery, 1%


Preparation/Dispensing, 8% Prescribing, 62% Chart 3: Classification of patient harm literature by WHO classification


5 Kraindler J, Gershlick B, Charlesworth A. Failing to capitalise: Capital spending in the NHS. The Health Foundation, March 2019.


6 Hall R. Warning over potential roof collapses at NHS England hospitals. The Guardian [Internet]. 16 August 2021. https://tinyurl.com/mvccb8n4


7 Slips, trip and falls in hospital. National Patient Safety Agency, 2007. https:// tinyurl.com/mrydrn5


8 Braithwaite J. Changing how we think about healthcare improvement. BMJ, 2018; 361:k2014 https://tinyurl.com/44kfdxej


9 Dickerman K, Barach P, Pentecost R 3rd. We shape our buildings, then they kill us: Why health-care buildings contribute to the error pandemic. World Hosp Health Serv. 2008; 44(2):15–23.


10 Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ 2000; 320: 18; 320 (7237): 768–770.


11 Ulrich R. Evidence-Based Design for Patient Safety. The Environment for Care – An NHS ESTATES SYMPOSIUM, pp. 14-18, 29, 35-36. April 2004.


12 Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine. National Academies Press; 2000. 312 p.


13 World Health Organization. The conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety. 15 January 2009 https://tinyurl.com/4banywc8


14 Scopus preview – Scopus – Welcome to Scopus Preview. https://www.scopus. com/home.uri


15 FOI Request to the National Institute for Health Research; response received on 20/07/2022.


David Jones


David Jones is the director of Estates, Facilities and Capital Development at the University Hospital of Southampton. Previously the director of Estates and Facilities at Brighton University Hospital Trust and, prior to that, director of Estates, Facilities and Capital at Western Sussex NHS Trust, he has worked in senior positions across the NHS for 14 years. A Fellow of IHEEM, with an MBA from the University of Surrey, he is currently working towards a PhD. in the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Southampton. His research is focused on understanding the causal relationship between backlog maintenance and patient outcomes within the acute sector of NHS England.


Medication/ IV Fluids, 27%


Resource/ Organisational Management, 24%


Clinical Process Procedure, 31%


Procedure/Treatment/ Intervention, 38%


General Care/ Management,


10% Tests/ Investigations, 16%


Specimens/ results, 2%


Detention/ Restraint, 1%


Non-Classified, 1% Clinical/Administration, 4%


Documentation, 7% Infrastructure/Buildings 0% Medical device, 3%


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112