search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INFECTION PREVENTION


How privacy screens reshape infection control


Abdel Amneina, Business Development manager at Silentia UK, discusses the benefits of modular privacy screens compared with traditional and antimicrobial curtains in terms of infection control, sustainability, cost-efficiency, and patient experience. Drawing on clinical research, international case studies, and practical implementation, he highlights the growing relevance of privacy screens for NHS and HSE healthcare estates.


Hospital privacy curtains, though essential for patient dignity, are increasingly being recognised as high-risk touchpoints. Recent scientific research, particularly a 2023 study published in Infection Prevention in Practice, investigated whether antimicrobial curtains offer a meaningful reduction in healthcare-associated infection (HAI) risk.1 Conducted at a major US military hospital, the study, titled ‘New patient privacy curtains to provide passive infection prevention’ measured the bacterial contamination of standard cloth curtains versus Endurocide antimicrobial variants over 20 weeks. The results revealed a 98 per cent reduction in colony-forming units (CFUs) – from 32.6 CFUs for cloth curtains down to 0.56 CFUs on the antimicrobial alternative. Furthermore, no HAIs were recorded during the trial period. Operational benefits included a projected annual saving of over £15,000 and a 67 hour reduction in staff time spent changing or managing curtains. However, while antimicrobial curtains offer


improvements, they remain fabric-based. Their decontamination depends on contact time, regular monitoring, and continued replacement. Some coatings require up to 24 hours to neutralise pathogens – a delay incompatible with high-traffic clinical environments. Moreover, the environmental consequences of antimicrobial coatings are under increased scrutiny. When washed or incinerated, treated curtains may release microplastics and silver nanoparticles into the water table or atmosphere.


Hard-surface screens: Immediate cleaning, zero downtime Silentia privacy screens reportedly address these issues with a fundamentally different design ethos. Their hard, non-porous surface allows immediate cleaning with standard disinfectants. Unlike curtains – which are usually cleaned off-site or only changed between patients on contact precautions – screens can be disinfected in situ, reducing both contamination risk and room downtime. Each screen component is part of a modular system, enabling precise configurations for wards, examination bays, surgical prep areas, or maternity suites. Cleaning protocols are simplified, standardised, and verifiable – aligning with NHS England’s National Standards of Healthcare Cleanliness 2021. These standards, while comprehensive, notably omit curtains as a high-frequency touchpoint – despite growing evidence of their role in cross-infection.


October 2025 Health Estate Journal 167


The advantages become especially pronounced in areas where rapid turnover and infection control are paramount, such as A&E, oncology, or surgical recovery. Here, screens not only outperform curtains in hygiene terms, but also enable more fluid patient flow by eliminating delays linked to laundering or curtain changes.


Sustainability in focus: Reducing waste and water use Environmental impact is now a central consideration for capital projects across NHS and HSE Trusts. In line with the Delivering a Net Zero NHS initiative, procurement teams are under pressure to adopt solutions that cut waste, water, and emissions. Curtains, whether disposable or washable, pose a notable burden. Disposable options, made from polypropylene or polyester, must be incinerated after use, contributing to clinical waste volume. Washable curtains consume thousands of litres of water and vast amounts of detergent and energy with every laundering cycle. In contrast, Silentia screens are designed to last over


10 years and require only surface disinfection. A recent Danish study estimated that switching from curtains to screens in a single ward can save 12,000–16,000 litres of wastewater and 3,600 kWh of energy per year. These figures are especially relevant in the context of rising utility costs and environmental audits. For larger estates, the cumulative benefit is significant – not only in cost terms, but also in ESG reporting and reputational impact.


Blekinge Hospital: Local landscape imagery on fixed and folding screens brings a welcoming feel to the reception area while defining spaces with a Scandinavian design aesthetic.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184