search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CLEANING CHEMICALS & DOSING EQUIPMENT


Hidden hazards in cleaning chemicals


Max Smith, Solutions Consultant at EcoOnline, talks to us about why cleaning chemicals can be dangerous, and how to mitigate the risks.


Over 40% of employees across the UK and Ireland are exposed to hazardous chemicals in their workplace. However, unfortunately less than a third of workers believe that their organisations are not actively working to substitute hazardous chemicals. Chemical management should be a fundamental consideration in any health and safety strategy, and organisations are required to do as much as they can to protect their workers against harms caused by hazardous substances.


So, where do these hidden chemical risks come from? Surprisingly, they can often be found in the very products used to keep workspaces sanitary and safe.


The dangers associated with cleaning products have been researched for years. A study conducted between 1998 and 2012 found that there were approximately 1,106 work-related asthma cases linked to cleaning product exposure. The study found that most cleaning supplies that contain VOCs (volatile organic compounds) such as acetone, benzene and formaldehyde, along with other harmful chemicals like ammonia and bleach that can cause damage to the lungs and cause long-term damage if left untreated. Many of these substances remain widely available despite the obvious health dangers. This lack of alignment not only endangers workers’ safety, but allows for preventable health burdens to develop.


With the obvious dangers posed, businesses have a legal responsibility under COSHH to protect workers by ensuring that working conditions are safe, and that the chemicals workers are exposed to are compliant with health and safety standards. To start, employers first need to proactively conduct COSHH risk assessments to identify which hazards are present in the workplace that need to be controlled. From there, they can accurately calculate hazards, outline the severity of the risk and implement control measures to minimise health risks.


Employers also have a responsibility to regularly conduct chemical safety training for employees.


48 | TOMORROW'S CLEANING


This way, employees can know what chemicals they are working with and learn how to use and dispose of them in a safe manner. Training workers more frequently than once a year is a best practice and should be implemented consistently. This proactive approach to workplace safety protects workers, improves productivity and keeps employees informed of regulatory changes which can affect themselves and the business they work for.


To protect workers in their day-to-day roles and comprehensively fulfil their duty of care, business leaders must consider the benefits of embracing focused technology solutions. The first step should be to implement a chemical management inventory, facilitating visibility into chemical use across workflows.


To feed into this transparency, safety data sheets are pivotal. These sheets provide individuals who interact with chemicals insight into the potential hazards, and detail how they can be safely handled and disposed of.


Once information on the chemicals has been collected, corporations can use chemical substitution technology to switch out harmful substances for those safer for workers to handle. By taking these steps, organisations can reduce the risk of harm and ensure long-term compliance.


As studies continue to reveal the variety of risks associated with everyday cleaning products, public awareness will continue to grow. To proactively protect workers, organisations should embrace company-wide visibility by adopting a chemical management inventory and begin implementing chemical substitution. Without decisive action now, the impact will continue to be felt by employees, leading to long-term damage to health and, for companies, the potential of future litigation.


www.ecoonline.com x.com/TomoCleaning


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60