search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sponsored by INSERT MEDIA  WEB VERSION: Click Here


The result of the fracas was that some 72,000 inserts were included in one edition and the 23,000 in the next edition. Whilst that in itself may not have been the fault of the publisher or the printer responsible for insertion, their systems certainly were. Procedures at Country Living’s printers were such that there was no count of how many went into each issue, the conclusion on counts being based finally on the reported delivery note weights.


Prior to the second batch of inserts being inserted, Bio-Gard requested that they be inserted in magazines to be sent to subscribers which did not receive the insert the previous month. Given that the subscriber address file would be similar, Bio-Gard considered that to be a reasonable request.


66


The request was rejected as impossible. But then, without accurate insertion records it would probably be the case.


Bio-Gard received a COI for the August edition from Walstead, the printer responsible for processing the subscriber inserts. The COI stated that the quantity inserted was 98,000 with no remainders (COD’s Wallop). That’s surprising, given that the full run was just 96,000. What’s equally surprising is that, at maximum, some 72,000 were inserted, subsequently confirmed by the publisher’s agency.


The reason both advertisers and the DMA Inserts Committee should be very concerned is summed up in an email Martin Harvey received from Canopy Media, stating that “Most (if


not all) print sites in the UK provide COI’s based on the information supplied by the printers/couriers whoever has packaged the inserts.”


If that is true, advertisers need to demand what systems and procedures publishers have in place to determine accurately how they measure and report the quantities of inserts stated on their COI’s.


But the buck does not stop there. Martin Harvey also defends Canopy Media and printers, like Walstead. “Even if more accurate COI’s are provided, we advertisers, we that expect the companies inserting our material to do it effectively and provide accurate COI’s, need to ensure that the delivery documentation presented to them is fully complete in the first place.”


Direct Commerce | homeofdirectcommerce.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70