search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
30 February / March 2021


and the 100 ppb working solution was used to prepare the 50 ppb, 10 ppb, 5 ppb, and 1 ppb standards.


Results and discussion


Adding ammonia to the make-up flow provided the strongest m/z response


Figure 3. Gradient method provides a higher resolution separation compared to isocratic method. (A) IC-sCD chromatogram obtained for 2-butynoic acid analysed by gradient method (black) (B) extracted ion chromatogram of m/z 171 (pink) (C) extracted ion chromatogram of m/z 127 (blue) analysed using MeCN: H2


O + 25 mM ammonia as additives in the make-up flow [2].


of 51 mA was used unless otherwise stated. Dionex ADRS 600 suppressor applies a direct fixed voltage to give the most suitable current to match the concentration of the eluent to suppress the hydroxide to water. A voltage of 4 V was used. The flow rate was maintained at 0.38 mL/min and an injection volume of 25 µL was used for all injections. The specifications of the isocratic and gradient methods are as follows:


• Isocratic method: 30 mM KOH, 30 °C, lower current 29 mA


• Gradient method: Initial 1 mM KOH for 8.5 min, then linear gradient to 15 mM over 10 min, then to 30 mM over a further 10 min and then to 54 mM in 1.5 min.


MS conditions


All MS experiments were performed using the following conditions: vaporiser temperature of 450°C, ion transfer tube temperature of 200°C, ionisation voltage of -2500 V, sheath gas pressure of 50 psi and auxiliary gas pressure of 5 psi. The system was operated in negative ion ESI mode for all analyses. The MS system, when operated in full scan mode, recorded data for the mass range of m/z 40-250. Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode was used for the analysis of deprotonated molecules. The MS ion source voltage (applied to aid desolvation) was set to 5 V for both the full scan and SIM analyses. Make-up flow of 1:1 acetonitrile: water (+ buffer additive, if used) was added at a rate of 0.1 mL/min.


Standards and sample preparation


Individual organic acid stock standard solutions were prepared at 10 ppm (v/v) or 10 mg/L, except for butynoic, crotonic,


and pentynoic acid solutions which were prepared at 50 ppm (v/v) or 50 mg/L. Mixed working stock solutions of 1 ppm and 100 ppb were prepared by diluting the stock solutions 10- and 100-fold respectively (50- and 500-fold for 50 ppm stock). These working stock solutions were then diluted to prepare a range of calibration standards between 1 ppb and 500 ppb. The 1 ppm working solution was used to prepare the 500 ppb, 200 ppb, and 100 ppb standards,


Table 1. R2 ppb using both IC-sCD and MS [2]. CD Component Acetic acid Linearity R2 0.9925


Propinoic acid 0.9926 Formic acid


0.9992


Butanoic acid 0.9958 Crotonic acid 0.9998 Pentanoic acid 0.9954 Propiolic acid n/a Butynoic acid n/a Pentynoic acid 0.9972


LOQ / ppb (vol/ vol)


1 1 1 1 5 1


n/a n/a 1


Linearity R2


0.9942 0.9863 0.9597 0.9903 0.9969 0.9927 0.9527 0.9880 0.9989


1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5


Table 2. Linearity and LOQ of organic acids within a 25 mg/L 2-butynoic acid sample matrix using IC-sCD and MS [2].


Component Acetic acid CD Linearity R2 0.9998


Propinoic acid 0.9998 Formic acid


0.9995


Butanoic acid 0.9970 Crotonic acid


Pentanoic acid 0.9997 Propiolic acid


n/a Pentynoic acid 0.9915 0.9997


0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.02


0.005 n/a


0.005


LOQ / %w/w Linearity R2 0.9814 0.9966 0.9944 0.9991 0.9993 0.9982 0.9944 0.9853


MS LOQ / %w/w


0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.05


MS LOQ / ppb


The main impurity of 2-butynoic acid, analysed using the isocratic method, produced an ion with m/z 127 with a partially co-eluting impurity at m/z 171 as shown by the extracted ion chromatograms (Figure 2A). Using different additives in the make-up flow resulted in different MS signal responses as shown in Figure 2. Based on its chemical composition, each additive (MeCN: H2


O, MeCN: H2 mM ammonium acetate and MeCN: H2


O + 12.5 O


+ 25 mM ammonia) helps to volatilise the analytes in solution and, in turn, contributes to the efficiency of the ionisation process. Of these additives, using 25mM ammonia in the make-up solvent provided a greater response for both m/z 127 and m/z 171 ions (Figure 2). Ammonia was therefore chosen for all subsequent experiments. As expected, the gradient method provided a


values demonstrating the linearity of a range of organic acid standards between 1 ppb and 500


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56